Comparing technical specs, games and benchmarks

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
VS
NVIDIA Quadro T1000

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU graphics card - clock speed 893 MHz / up to 1358 MHz, 4 GB memory - clock speed 11000 MHz and bandwidth , TPD

NVIDIA Quadro T1000 graphics card - clock speed 1395 MHz / up to 1455 MHz,  memory - clock speed 8000 MHz and bandwidth , TPD 50 Watt

VS

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000
General Information

To quickly define the best graphics card comparing NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU to NVIDIA Quadro T1000, you can check an overall position in the performance rating which is computed by special formula and notes every benchmark. It is an average rate, so we recommend paying attention to all technical specifications.

128
Place in performance rating
220
Ampere
Architecture
Turing
GA104
Code name
TU117
no data
Type
Workstation
12 April 2021 (less than a year ago)
Release date
27 May 2019 (2 years ago)
no data
Price now
$1820
no data
Value for money
7.03
no data
GPU code name
TU117
Laptop
Market segment
Workstation

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000
Technical Specifications

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000. The base technical info section helps you understand the difference between NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU and NVIDIA Quadro T1000. You will easily get which is more efficient following our tips; the best option is highlighted in different colours. If some specifications are identical, you should compare other features.

893 MHz
Core clock speed
1395 MHz
1358 MHz
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
no data
Transistor count
4,700 million
8 nm
Manufacturing process technology
12 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
50 Watt
2560
CUDA cores per GPU
no data
no data
Boost clock speed
1455 MHz
no data
Number of transistors
4,700 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
50 Watt

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000
Dimensions and Compatibility

Here you learn supported PCLe, graphics cards’ size and supplementary connectors which mainly high-performance models have. The technical information does not influence performance rating much. NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000.

no data
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
no data
Supplementary power connectors
None
large
Laptop size
no data

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000
GPU RAM Frequency and Speed

Integral RAM is applied for storage and data transmission. The higher graphic memory standards ism the faster and more efficient data proceeding, working or gaming processes are. Also, note please memory width and bandwidth. The higher figures are, the better it is. NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000?

GDDR6
Memory type
no data
4 GB
Maximum RAM amount
no data
128 Bit
Memory bus width
no data
11000 MHz
Memory clock speed
8000 MHz
-
Shared memory
no data

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000
Port and Display Support

Some graphics cards support supplementary display connectors. Here you see whether the compared models support the port. NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000.

no data
Display Connectors
No outputs

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000
API support

We are almost there. Soon you will find which graphics card is better – NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU or NVIDIA Quadro T1000! Here you learn a supported version of unified development standards of 3D DirectX and OpenGL.

DirectX 12_2, Shader 7.0
DirectX
12.0 (12_1)
no data
OpenGL
4.6

Game Performance

Guys, to get which graphics card among NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU and NVIDIA Quadro T1000 works faster in games, it is enough to choose one from the list below and tap APPLY. In a comparative table, you learn a high-speed performance level of a graphics card on different screen resolutions, ranging from the lowest on to 4K. Colour palette helps you quickly pick the best option.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
NVIDIA Quadro T1000
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
NVIDIA Quadro T1000
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
NVIDIA Quadro T1000
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
NVIDIA Quadro T1000
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
NVIDIA Quadro T1000
Legend
5 Stutter – How graphics cards operate in the game is being examined for the time being. As per interpolation of the similar graphics cards showing low frame rates, the game is possible to lag.
May Stutter – How graphics cards operate in the game is being examined for the time being. As per interpolation of the similar graphics cards showing low frame rates, the game is possible to lag.
30 Fluent – In considering all graphics benchmarks, the game speed is likely to be 25 fps or more.
40 Fluent – In considering all graphics benchmarks, the game speed is likely to be 35 fps or more.
60 Fluent – In considering all graphics benchmarks, the game speed is likely to be 58 fps or more.
May Run Fluently – How graphics cards operate in the game is being examined for the time being. As per interpolation of the similar graphics cards showing low frame rates, the game is possible to lag.
? Uncertain – The graphics card testing has revealed a slower card might ensure a high and stable frame rate.
Uncertain – How graphics cards operate in the game is being examined for the time being. The interpolation in the same category is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU

4.99% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (8 nm vs 12 nm)

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro T1000

There is no accountable advantage

So, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU or NVIDIA Quadro T1000?

Which is one better to choose, NVIDIA or AMD? We recommend NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU .

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU versus NVIDIA Quadro T1000 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

The 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test is designed for mid-range laptops and home PCs with integrated video graphics. The test uses the DirectX 11 engine, which is limited by Direct3D 10 capabilities. Accordingly, Cloud Gate is best suited for testing modern entry-level systems and legacy DX10-enabled GPUs.

3DMark Fire Strike Score

Fire Strike, Fire Strike Extreme, Fire Strike Ultra. Fire Strike includes two graphics tests, a physics test and a combined test that stresses the CPU and GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

3DMark Fire Strike for Graphics Cards helps you determine performance in a state-of-the-art synthetic test that consists of two levels - physical and combined testing.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

The result of the 3DMark 11 benchmark evaluation supports tessellation, compute shaders and graphics card multithreading will show which graphics card model is better and faster in games. The higher the score of the video card in the 3DMark 11 benchmark, the better.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage Performance reveals the real performance of video cards tested by users in their computers. Only the best graphics card deserves the highest score in the 3DMark Vantage Performance benchmark.

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Detailed benchmark results for GeekBench 5 CUDA video cards in the list of all video cards can be found on this page. The higher the GeekBench 5 score, the faster and more powerful the graphics card.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Benchmark GeekBench 5 OpenCL is a specialized version of a synthetic test that determines how the technical characteristics of a video card cope with loads in different programmable scenarios. Based on version 5, updated regularly.

Passmark GPU

Passmark is an effective benchmark that displays true results on the speed of data processing by GPU cores. We present the results of the evaluation of the performance of a video card in the modern Passmark benchmark, which evaluates the performance of a video card using its own rendering algorithms. The higher the score, the more powerful the graphics card.

Is the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU better than NVIDIA Quadro T1000? - User Rating.

0.0 Out of CMPTEK score
4.4 Out of CMPTEK score