Comparing technical specs, games and benchmarks

NVIDIA Quadro K2200
VS
GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 GAMING OC
123123
VS

General Information

To quickly define the best graphics card comparing NVIDIA Quadro K2200 to GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 GAMING OC, you can check an overall position in the performance rating which is computed by special formula and notes every benchmark. It is an average rate, so we recommend paying attention to all technical specifications.

267
Place in performance rating
33.27
Value for money (0-100)
Maxwell
Architecture
Ampere
GM107
Code name
GA104
Workstation
Type
PC
22 July 2014
Release date
2020
$395.75
Launch price (MSRP)
1955 $
$123
Price now
2100 $

Technical Specifications

The base technical info section helps you understand the difference between NVIDIA Quadro K2200 and GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 GAMING OC. You will easily get which is more efficient following our tips; the best option is highlighted in different colours. If some specifications are identical, you should compare other features.

640
Pipelines
1046 MHz
Core clock speed
1500 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1815 MHz
1,870 million
Transistor count
17,400 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
8 nm
68 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
220 W
44.96
Texture fill rate
334.0 GTexel/s
1,439 gflops
Floating-point performance
21.37 TFLOPS
no data
Maximum GPU temperature
93°
no data
Compute units
5888
no data
Gigaflops
20370 GFLOPS

Dimensions and Compatibility

Here you learn supported PCLe, graphics cards’ size and supplementary connectors which mainly high-performance models have. The technical information does not influence performance rating much.

PCIe 2.0 x16
Interface
202 mm
Length
286 mm
None
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
no data
Recommended system power (PSU)
650 W
no data
Bus support
PCI-E 4.0 x 16
no data
Width
115 mm
no data
Height
51 mm
no data
Minimum recommended system power
220 W

RAM Frequency and Speed

Integral RAM is applied for storage and data transmission. The higher graphic memory standards ism the faster and more efficient data proceeding, working or gaming processes are. Also, note please memory width and bandwidth. The higher figures are, the better it is.

GDDR5
Memory type
GDDR6
4 GB
Maximum RAM amount
8 GB
128 Bit
Memory bus width
256 bit
5012 MHz
Memory clock speed
1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective
80.19 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
448.0 GB/s

Port and Display Support

Some graphics cards support supplementary display connectors. Here you see whether the compared models support the port.

1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Display Connectors
no data
Display Port
DisplayPort 1.4a *2
no data
HDMI
HDMI 2.1 *2

Technologies

Mind please this section provides the information and does not compute the overall performance while comparing NVIDIA Quadro K2200 and GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 GAMING OC. As each manufacturer builds his/her own drivers and improvements in models which may be similar but stay different.

API support

We are almost there. Soon you will find which graphics card is better – NVIDIA Quadro K2200 or GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 GAMING OC! Here you learn a supported version of unified development standards of 3D DirectX and OpenGL.

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
+
Vulkan
1.2
no data
OpenCL
3.0
no data
DirectX 11.2
12 Ultimate

Game Performance

Guys, to get which graphics card among NVIDIA Quadro K2200 and GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 GAMING OC works faster in games, it is enough to choose one from the list below and tap APPLY. In a comparative table, you learn a high-speed performance level of a graphics card on different screen resolutions, ranging from the lowest on to 4K. Colour palette helps you quickly pick the best option.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K2200
GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 GAMING OC
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K2200
GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 GAMING OC
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K2200
GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 GAMING OC
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K2200
GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 GAMING OC
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K2200
GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 GAMING OC
Legend
5 Stutter – How graphics cards operate in the game is being examined for the time being. As per interpolation of the similar graphics cards showing low frame rates, the game is possible to lag.
May Stutter – How graphics cards operate in the game is being examined for the time being. As per interpolation of the similar graphics cards showing low frame rates, the game is possible to lag.
30 Fluent – In considering all graphics benchmarks, the game speed is likely to be 25 fps or more.
40 Fluent – In considering all graphics benchmarks, the game speed is likely to be 35 fps or more.
60 Fluent – In considering all graphics benchmarks, the game speed is likely to be 58 fps or more.
May Run Fluently – How graphics cards operate in the game is being examined for the time being. As per interpolation of the similar graphics cards showing low frame rates, the game is possible to lag.
? Uncertain – The graphics card testing has revealed a slower card might ensure a high and stable frame rate.
Uncertain – How graphics cards operate in the game is being examined for the time being. The interpolation in the same category is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro K2200

Cheaper ($123 vs 2100 $)

Less power consumption (68 Watt vs 220 W)

Advantages of GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 GAMING OC

Finer manufacturing process technology (8 nm vs 28 nm)

More maximum RAM amount (8 GB vs 4 GB)

More memory bandwidth (448.0 GB/s vs 80.19 GB/s)

G-SYNC support

VR Ready

Multi Monitor

So, NVIDIA Quadro K2200 or GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 GAMING OC?

Which is one better to choose, NVIDIA or AMD? We recommend NVIDIA Quadro K2200 .

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 versus GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 GAMING OC performance benchmarks comparison

Is the NVIDIA Quadro K2200 better than GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 GAMING OC? - User Rating.

4.3 Out of 15 CMPtek Score
5.0 Out of 1 CMPtek Score