Comparing technical specs, games and benchmarks

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D
VS
Intel UHD Graphics 630

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D graphics card - clock speed 625 MHz / up to , 1 GB memory - clock speed 2600 MHz and bandwidth 41.6 GB/s, TPD 62 Watt

Intel UHD Graphics 630 graphics card - clock speed 300 MHz / up to 1150 MHz,  memory - clock speed and bandwidth , TPD 15 Watt

VS

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs Intel UHD Graphics 630
General Information

To quickly define the best graphics card comparing NVIDIA Quadro 2000D to Intel UHD Graphics 630, you can check an overall position in the performance rating which is computed by special formula and notes every benchmark. It is an average rate, so we recommend paying attention to all technical specifications.

672
Place in performance rating
614
6.65
Value for money (0-100)
Fermi
Architecture
Gen. 9.5
GF106
Code name
Comet Lake GT2
Workstation
Type
Desktop
5 October 2011 (10 years ago)
Release date
1 October 2017 (4 years ago)
$599
Launch price (MSRP)
$79 (0.1x MSRP)
Price now
$884
0.92
Value for money
1.01
GF106
GPU code name
Kaby-Lake-H-GT2
Workstation
Market segment
Desktop

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs Intel UHD Graphics 630
Technical Specifications

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs Intel UHD Graphics 630. The base technical info section helps you understand the difference between NVIDIA Quadro 2000D and Intel UHD Graphics 630. You will easily get which is more efficient following our tips; the best option is highlighted in different colours. If some specifications are identical, you should compare other features.

192
Pipelines
184
625 MHz
Core clock speed
300 MHz
no data
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
1,170 million
Transistor count
189 million
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
62 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
20.00
Texture fill rate
26.45
480.0 gflops
Floating-point performance
460.8 gflops
192
Pipelines / CUDA cores
24
no data
Boost clock speed
1150 MHz
1,170 million
Number of transistors
189 million
62 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
15 Watt

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs Intel UHD Graphics 630
Dimensions and Compatibility

Here you learn supported PCLe, graphics cards’ size and supplementary connectors which mainly high-performance models have. The technical information does not influence performance rating much. NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs Intel UHD Graphics 630.

PCIe 2.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
178 mm
Length
None
Supplementary power connectors

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU RAM Frequency and Speed

Integral RAM is applied for storage and data transmission. The higher graphic memory standards ism the faster and more efficient data proceeding, working or gaming processes are. Also, note please memory width and bandwidth. The higher figures are, the better it is. NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs Intel UHD Graphics 630?

GDDR5
Memory type
System Shared
1 GB
Maximum RAM amount
128 Bit
Memory bus width
64/128 Bit
2600 MHz
Memory clock speed
41.6 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
no data
Shared memory
+

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs Intel UHD Graphics 630
Port and Display Support

Some graphics cards support supplementary display connectors. Here you see whether the compared models support the port. NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs Intel UHD Graphics 630.

2x DVI
Display Connectors
No outputs

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs Intel UHD Graphics 630
Technologies

Mind please this section provides the information and does not compute the overall performance while comparing NVIDIA Quadro 2000D and Intel UHD Graphics 630. As each manufacturer builds his/her own drivers and improvements in models which may be similar but stay different.

2.1
CUDA
no data
Quick Sync
+

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs Intel UHD Graphics 630
API support

We are almost there. Soon you will find which graphics card is better – NVIDIA Quadro 2000D or Intel UHD Graphics 630! Here you learn a supported version of unified development standards of 3D DirectX and OpenGL.

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
Vulkan
1.1.103
5.1
Shader Model
6.5
1.1
OpenCL
2.1

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs Intel UHD Graphics 630
Mining hashrates

31 Mh/s
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
no data

Game Performance

Guys, to get which graphics card among NVIDIA Quadro 2000D and Intel UHD Graphics 630 works faster in games, it is enough to choose one from the list below and tap APPLY. In a comparative table, you learn a high-speed performance level of a graphics card on different screen resolutions, ranging from the lowest on to 4K. Colour palette helps you quickly pick the best option.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro 2000D
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro 2000D
Intel UHD Graphics 630
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro 2000D
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro 2000D
Intel UHD Graphics 630 38.1 13.2 7.5 5.4
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro 2000D
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Legend
5 Stutter – How graphics cards operate in the game is being examined for the time being. As per interpolation of the similar graphics cards showing low frame rates, the game is possible to lag.
May Stutter – How graphics cards operate in the game is being examined for the time being. As per interpolation of the similar graphics cards showing low frame rates, the game is possible to lag.
30 Fluent – In considering all graphics benchmarks, the game speed is likely to be 25 fps or more.
40 Fluent – In considering all graphics benchmarks, the game speed is likely to be 35 fps or more.
60 Fluent – In considering all graphics benchmarks, the game speed is likely to be 58 fps or more.
May Run Fluently – How graphics cards operate in the game is being examined for the time being. As per interpolation of the similar graphics cards showing low frame rates, the game is possible to lag.
? Uncertain – The graphics card testing has revealed a slower card might ensure a high and stable frame rate.
Uncertain – How graphics cards operate in the game is being examined for the time being. The interpolation in the same category is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro 2000D

Cheaper ($79 (0.1x MSRP) vs $884)

More pipelines (192 vs 184)

Advantages of Intel UHD Graphics 630

0.94% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 40 nm)

Less power consumption (15 Watt vs 62 Watt)

G-SYNC support

VR Ready

Multi Monitor

So, NVIDIA Quadro 2000D or Intel UHD Graphics 630?

Which is one better to choose, NVIDIA or AMD? We recommend Intel UHD Graphics 630 .

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D versus Intel UHD Graphics 630 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

3DMark Ice Storm is the only fully cross-platform benchmark that runs on all devices. It's great for comparing the 3D performance of smartphones, tablets, ultraportable laptops, and old or low-end PCs.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

The 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test is designed for mid-range laptops and home PCs with integrated video graphics. The test uses the DirectX 11 engine, which is limited by Direct3D 10 capabilities. Accordingly, Cloud Gate is best suited for testing modern entry-level systems and legacy DX10-enabled GPUs.

3DMark Fire Strike Score

Fire Strike, Fire Strike Extreme, Fire Strike Ultra. Fire Strike includes two graphics tests, a physics test and a combined test that stresses the CPU and GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

3DMark Fire Strike for Graphics Cards helps you determine performance in a state-of-the-art synthetic test that consists of two levels - physical and combined testing.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

The result of the 3DMark 11 benchmark evaluation supports tessellation, compute shaders and graphics card multithreading will show which graphics card model is better and faster in games. The higher the score of the video card in the 3DMark 11 benchmark, the better.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage Performance reveals the real performance of video cards tested by users in their computers. Only the best graphics card deserves the highest score in the 3DMark Vantage Performance benchmark.

SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks

The SPECviewperf 12 benchmark with the 'Solidworks' scenario is an extended test of a graphics card. Video card performance in the SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks test is performed through 10 variants of 3D models and includes more than 50 scripts. Benchmark renders models: Audi R8, Black Owl, Digger, Ferrari, Menjac, SpaceShipCrawler and supercar.

Unigine Heaven 3.0

Unigine Heaven 3.0 is Unigine's benchmark for Direct3D and OpenGL tessellation. Benchmark is great for checking the efficiency and performance of older graphics cards.

SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX

Benchmark SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX is designed to test the performance of a video card in the 3D modeling mode of various objects (power unit, i.e. engine or SUV).

SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase

SPECviewperf 12 video card benchmark in 'Showcase' mode tests performance in rendering 3D models with shading and shadow projection effects.

Octane Render OctaneBench

OctaneRender is a true, unbiased ray tracer that runs entirely on the GPU. Thanks to the Octane Render benchmark, you can easily determine how good a graphics card is in performance.

SPECviewperf 12 - Medical

The SPECviewperf 12 GPU benchmark set with Medical scenario has two datasets: a 4D heart dataset consisting of multiple 3D volumes that repeat over time. They were obtained using a phase-contrast MRI scanner. The 80 MB dataset was provided by the Department of Radiology, Stanford School of Medicine and Lucille Packard Children's Hospital.

SPECviewperf 12 - Maya

The SPECviewperf 12 benchmark with the 'Maya' scripting suite was created in Autodesk software. SPECviewperf 12 'Maya' includes many rendering modes for the graphics card and contains various visual effects.

SPECviewperf 12 - Energy

GPU performance testing in the SPECviewperf 12 benchmark with the 'Energy' script set shows the real results of the video card performance in 3D simulation conditions.

SPECviewperf 12 - Creo

The SPECviewperf 12 benchmark in the ‘Creo’ script mode determines the speed of the GPU in the car and airplane rendering mode.

SPECviewperf 12 - Catia

The SPECviewperf 12 benchmark with the 'Catia' script set gives the results of the video card performance when simulating 3D objects (car, plane, SUV).

SPECviewperf 12 - 3ds Max

The SPECviewperf 12 benchmark with an updated version of the '3ds Max' script reflects the actual performance of the graphics card through rendering tests. The higher the SPECviewperf 12 score, the better the speed of the graphics card.

Passmark GPU

Passmark is an effective benchmark that displays true results on the speed of data processing by GPU cores. We present the results of the evaluation of the performance of a video card in the modern Passmark benchmark, which evaluates the performance of a video card using its own rendering algorithms. The higher the score, the more powerful the graphics card.

Is the NVIDIA Quadro 2000D better than Intel UHD Graphics 630? - User Rating.

5.0 Out of CMPTEK score
3.4 Out of CMPTEK score