Comparing technical specs, games and benchmarks

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
VS
AMD Radeon R9 Nano

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 graphics card - clock speed 1530 MHz / up to 1785 MHz, 6 GB memory - clock speed 8000 MHz and bandwidth 192.1 GB/s, TPD 120 Watt

AMD Radeon R9 Nano graphics card - clock speed / up to 1000 MHz, 4 GB memory - clock speed 500 MHz and bandwidth 512 GB/s, TPD 175 Watt

VS

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano
General Information

To quickly define the best graphics card comparing NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 to AMD Radeon R9 Nano, you can check an overall position in the performance rating which is computed by special formula and notes every benchmark. It is an average rate, so we recommend paying attention to all technical specifications.

111
Place in performance rating
170
62.49
Value for money (0-100)
23.65
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.2
TU116
Code name
Fiji
Desktop
Type
Desktop
14 March 2019 (3 years ago)
Release date
10 September 2015 (6 years ago)
$219
Launch price (MSRP)
$649
$489 (2.2x MSRP)
Price now
$691 (1.1x MSRP)
no data
Design
reference
50.10
Value for money
11.71
Turing TU116
GPU code name
Fiji
Desktop
Market segment
Desktop

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano
Technical Specifications

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano. The base technical info section helps you understand the difference between NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 and AMD Radeon R9 Nano. You will easily get which is more efficient following our tips; the best option is highlighted in different colours. If some specifications are identical, you should compare other features.

1408
Pipelines
4096
1530 MHz
Core clock speed
no data
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
6,600 million
Transistor count
8,900 million
12 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
120 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
175 Watt
157.1
Texture fill rate
256.0
no data
Floating-point performance
8,192 gflops
no data
Compute units
64
1408
Pipelines / CUDA cores
4096
1785 MHz
Boost clock speed
1000 MHz
6,600 million
Number of transistors
8,900 million
120 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
175 Watt

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano
Dimensions and Compatibility

Here you learn supported PCLe, graphics cards’ size and supplementary connectors which mainly high-performance models have. The technical information does not influence performance rating much. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano.

PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
229 mm
Length
152 mm
1x 8-pin
Supplementary power connectors
1x 8-pin
no data
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
no data
Bridgeless CrossFire
1

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano
GPU RAM Frequency and Speed

Integral RAM is applied for storage and data transmission. The higher graphic memory standards ism the faster and more efficient data proceeding, working or gaming processes are. Also, note please memory width and bandwidth. The higher figures are, the better it is. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano?

GDDR5
Memory type
High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)
6 GB
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
192 Bit
Memory bus width
4096 Bit
8000 MHz
Memory clock speed
500 MHz
192.1 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
512 GB/s
-
Shared memory
-
no data
High bandwidth memory (HBM)
+

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano
Port and Display Support

Some graphics cards support supplementary display connectors. Here you see whether the compared models support the port. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano.

1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Display Connectors
1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
no data
Eyefinity
+
no data
Number of Eyefinity displays
6
+
HDMI
+
no data
DisplayPort support
+

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano
Technologies

Mind please this section provides the information and does not compute the overall performance while comparing NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 and AMD Radeon R9 Nano. As each manufacturer builds his/her own drivers and improvements in models which may be similar but stay different.

7.5
CUDA
no data
no data
AppAcceleration
+
no data
CrossFire
1
no data
FRTC
1
no data
FreeSync
1
no data
HD3D
+
no data
LiquidVR
1
no data
PowerTune
+
no data
TressFX
1
no data
TrueAudio
+
no data
ZeroCore
+
no data
VCE
+
no data
DDMA audio
+
no data
Enduro
-

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano
API support

We are almost there. Soon you will find which graphics card is better – NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 or AMD Radeon R9 Nano! Here you learn a supported version of unified development standards of 3D DirectX and OpenGL.

12 (12_1)
DirectX
DirectX® 12
4.6
OpenGL
4.5
1.2.131
Vulkan
+
6.5
Shader Model
6.3
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
no data
Mantle
+

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano
Mining hashrates

no data
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
30 Mh/s
no data
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash)
295 Sol/s

Game Performance

Guys, to get which graphics card among NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 and AMD Radeon R9 Nano works faster in games, it is enough to choose one from the list below and tap APPLY. In a comparative table, you learn a high-speed performance level of a graphics card on different screen resolutions, ranging from the lowest on to 4K. Colour palette helps you quickly pick the best option.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 130 82 67 54 40 21
AMD Radeon R9 Nano
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 138 86.7 79.3 77.6 53.3 28.6
AMD Radeon R9 Nano
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 292 160 128 89.8 66.1 37.2
AMD Radeon R9 Nano
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 297.9 141.7 92 61.9 43 22.8
AMD Radeon R9 Nano
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 257 138 121 115 71.7 38.2
AMD Radeon R9 Nano
Legend
5 Stutter – How graphics cards operate in the game is being examined for the time being. As per interpolation of the similar graphics cards showing low frame rates, the game is possible to lag.
May Stutter – How graphics cards operate in the game is being examined for the time being. As per interpolation of the similar graphics cards showing low frame rates, the game is possible to lag.
30 Fluent – In considering all graphics benchmarks, the game speed is likely to be 25 fps or more.
40 Fluent – In considering all graphics benchmarks, the game speed is likely to be 35 fps or more.
60 Fluent – In considering all graphics benchmarks, the game speed is likely to be 58 fps or more.
May Run Fluently – How graphics cards operate in the game is being examined for the time being. As per interpolation of the similar graphics cards showing low frame rates, the game is possible to lag.
? Uncertain – The graphics card testing has revealed a slower card might ensure a high and stable frame rate.
Uncertain – How graphics cards operate in the game is being examined for the time being. The interpolation in the same category is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660

Cheaper ($489 (2.2x MSRP) vs $691 (1.1x MSRP))

Finer manufacturing process technology (12 nm vs 28 nm)

Less power consumption (120 Watt vs 175 Watt)

More maximum RAM amount (6 GB vs 4 GB)

Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano

1.43% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (4096 vs 1408)

More memory bandwidth (512 GB/s vs 192.1 GB/s)

So, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 or AMD Radeon R9 Nano?

Which is one better to choose, NVIDIA or AMD? We recommend AMD Radeon R9 Nano .

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 versus AMD Radeon R9 Nano performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

3DMark Ice Storm is the only fully cross-platform benchmark that runs on all devices. It's great for comparing the 3D performance of smartphones, tablets, ultraportable laptops, and old or low-end PCs.

Unigine Heaven 4.0

Heaven Benchmark is a GPU-intensive test of a graphics card that unleashes the full potential of GPU cores. This powerful tool can be effectively used to determine the stability of the GPU under extreme load conditions, as well as to check the potential of the cooling system at maximum heat generation.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

The 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test is designed for mid-range laptops and home PCs with integrated video graphics. The test uses the DirectX 11 engine, which is limited by Direct3D 10 capabilities. Accordingly, Cloud Gate is best suited for testing modern entry-level systems and legacy DX10-enabled GPUs.

3DMark Fire Strike Score

Fire Strike, Fire Strike Extreme, Fire Strike Ultra. Fire Strike includes two graphics tests, a physics test and a combined test that stresses the CPU and GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

3DMark Fire Strike for Graphics Cards helps you determine performance in a state-of-the-art synthetic test that consists of two levels - physical and combined testing.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

The result of the 3DMark 11 benchmark evaluation supports tessellation, compute shaders and graphics card multithreading will show which graphics card model is better and faster in games. The higher the score of the video card in the 3DMark 11 benchmark, the better.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage Performance reveals the real performance of video cards tested by users in their computers. Only the best graphics card deserves the highest score in the 3DMark Vantage Performance benchmark.

Passmark GPU

Passmark is an effective benchmark that displays true results on the speed of data processing by GPU cores. We present the results of the evaluation of the performance of a video card in the modern Passmark benchmark, which evaluates the performance of a video card using its own rendering algorithms. The higher the score, the more powerful the graphics card.

Is the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 better than AMD Radeon R9 Nano? - User Rating.

4.2 Out of CMPTEK score
5.0 Out of CMPTEK score