Comparing technical specs, games and benchmarks


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super graphics card - clock speed 1530 MHz / up to 1785 MHz, 6 GB memory - clock speed 14000 MHz and bandwidth 336.0 GB/s, TPD 125 Watt
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 graphics card - clock speed 1138 MHz / up to 1471 MHz, 8 GB memory - clock speed 800 MHz and bandwidth 409.6 GB/s, TPD 210 Watt
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
General Information
To quickly define the best graphics card comparing NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super to AMD Radeon RX Vega 56, you can check an overall position in the performance rating which is computed by special formula and notes every benchmark. It is an average rate, so we recommend paying attention to all technical specifications.
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
Technical Specifications
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 56. The base technical info section helps you understand the difference between NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super and AMD Radeon RX Vega 56. You will easily get which is more efficient following our tips; the best option is highlighted in different colours. If some specifications are identical, you should compare other features.
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
Dimensions and Compatibility
Here you learn supported PCLe, graphics cards’ size and supplementary connectors which mainly high-performance models have. The technical information does not influence performance rating much. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 56.
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
GPU RAM Frequency and Speed
Integral RAM is applied for storage and data transmission. The higher graphic memory standards ism the faster and more efficient data proceeding, working or gaming processes are. Also, note please memory width and bandwidth. The higher figures are, the better it is. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 56?
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
Port and Display Support
Some graphics cards support supplementary display connectors. Here you see whether the compared models support the port. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 56.
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
Technologies
Mind please this section provides the information and does not compute the overall performance while comparing NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super and AMD Radeon RX Vega 56. As each manufacturer builds his/her own drivers and improvements in models which may be similar but stay different.
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
API support
We are almost there. Soon you will find which graphics card is better – NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super or AMD Radeon RX Vega 56! Here you learn a supported version of unified development standards of 3D DirectX and OpenGL.
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
Mining hashrates
Game Performance
Guys, to get which graphics card among NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super and AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 works faster in games, it is enough to choose one from the list below and tap APPLY. In a comparative table, you learn a high-speed performance level of a graphics card on different screen resolutions, ranging from the lowest on to 4K. Colour palette helps you quickly pick the best option.
low
1280x720 |
med.
1920x1080 |
high
1920x1080 |
ultra
1920x1080 |
QHD
2560x1440 |
4K
3840x2160 |
||
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super | 138 | 88 | 73 | 57 | 44 | 24 |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 | |||||||
Death Stranding (2020) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super | 147 | 93.8 | 86 | 84.3 | 58.5 | 31.5 |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 | |||||||
F1 2020 (2020) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super | 298 | 171 | 137 | 94.3 | 69.3 | 39 |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 | |||||||
Gears Tactics (2020) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super | 324.4 | 162.1 | 104.8 | 72.2 | 46 | 24.1 |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 | |||||||
Doom Eternal (2020) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super | 265 | 143 | 126 | 122 | 73.4 | 34.4 |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 |
Legend | |
5 | Stutter – How graphics cards operate in the game is being examined for the time being. As per interpolation of the similar graphics cards showing low frame rates, the game is possible to lag. |
May Stutter – How graphics cards operate in the game is being examined for the time being. As per interpolation of the similar graphics cards showing low frame rates, the game is possible to lag. | |
30 | Fluent – In considering all graphics benchmarks, the game speed is likely to be 25 fps or more. |
40 | Fluent – In considering all graphics benchmarks, the game speed is likely to be 35 fps or more. |
60 | Fluent – In considering all graphics benchmarks, the game speed is likely to be 58 fps or more. |
May Run Fluently – How graphics cards operate in the game is being examined for the time being. As per interpolation of the similar graphics cards showing low frame rates, the game is possible to lag. | |
? | Uncertain – The graphics card testing has revealed a slower card might ensure a high and stable frame rate. |
Uncertain – How graphics cards operate in the game is being examined for the time being. The interpolation in the same category is not possible. | |
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results. |
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super
Cheaper ($424 (1.9x MSRP) vs $1587 (4x MSRP))
Finer manufacturing process technology (12 nm vs 14 nm)
Less power consumption (125 Watt vs 210 Watt)
G-SYNC support
Advantages of AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
2.93% faster in synthetic tests
More pipelines (3584 vs 1408)
More maximum RAM amount (8 GB vs 6 GB)
More memory bandwidth (409.6 GB/s vs 336.0 GB/s)
So, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super or AMD Radeon RX Vega 56?
Which is one better to choose, NVIDIA or AMD? We recommend AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 .
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super versus AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 performance benchmarks comparison
3DMark Ice Storm is the only fully cross-platform benchmark that runs on all devices. It's great for comparing the 3D performance of smartphones, tablets, ultraportable laptops, and old or low-end PCs.
The 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test is designed for mid-range laptops and home PCs with integrated video graphics. The test uses the DirectX 11 engine, which is limited by Direct3D 10 capabilities. Accordingly, Cloud Gate is best suited for testing modern entry-level systems and legacy DX10-enabled GPUs.
Fire Strike, Fire Strike Extreme, Fire Strike Ultra. Fire Strike includes two graphics tests, a physics test and a combined test that stresses the CPU and GPU.
3DMark Fire Strike for Graphics Cards helps you determine performance in a state-of-the-art synthetic test that consists of two levels - physical and combined testing.
The result of the 3DMark 11 benchmark evaluation supports tessellation, compute shaders and graphics card multithreading will show which graphics card model is better and faster in games. The higher the score of the video card in the 3DMark 11 benchmark, the better.
3DMark Vantage Performance reveals the real performance of video cards tested by users in their computers. Only the best graphics card deserves the highest score in the 3DMark Vantage Performance benchmark.
Passmark is an effective benchmark that displays true results on the speed of data processing by GPU cores. We present the results of the evaluation of the performance of a video card in the modern Passmark benchmark, which evaluates the performance of a video card using its own rendering algorithms. The higher the score, the more powerful the graphics card.