Comparing technical specs, games and benchmarks


ATI Radeon X1600 XT graphics card - clock speed 590 MHz / up to , 256 MB memory - clock speed 1380 MHz and bandwidth 22.08 GB/s, TPD 42 Watt
NVIDIA GeForce MX330 graphics card - clock speed 1531 MHz / up to 1594 MHz, 2 GB memory - clock speed 7000 MHz and bandwidth 48.06 GB/s, TPD 10 Watt
ATI Radeon X1600 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce MX330
General Information
To quickly define the best graphics card comparing ATI Radeon X1600 XT to NVIDIA GeForce MX330, you can check an overall position in the performance rating which is computed by special formula and notes every benchmark. It is an average rate, so we recommend paying attention to all technical specifications.
ATI Radeon X1600 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce MX330
Technical Specifications
ATI Radeon X1600 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce MX330. The base technical info section helps you understand the difference between ATI Radeon X1600 XT and NVIDIA GeForce MX330. You will easily get which is more efficient following our tips; the best option is highlighted in different colours. If some specifications are identical, you should compare other features.
ATI Radeon X1600 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce MX330
Dimensions and Compatibility
Here you learn supported PCLe, graphics cards’ size and supplementary connectors which mainly high-performance models have. The technical information does not influence performance rating much. ATI Radeon X1600 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce MX330.
ATI Radeon X1600 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce MX330
GPU RAM Frequency and Speed
Integral RAM is applied for storage and data transmission. The higher graphic memory standards ism the faster and more efficient data proceeding, working or gaming processes are. Also, note please memory width and bandwidth. The higher figures are, the better it is. ATI Radeon X1600 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce MX330?
ATI Radeon X1600 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce MX330
Port and Display Support
Some graphics cards support supplementary display connectors. Here you see whether the compared models support the port. ATI Radeon X1600 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce MX330.
ATI Radeon X1600 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce MX330
Technologies
Mind please this section provides the information and does not compute the overall performance while comparing ATI Radeon X1600 XT and NVIDIA GeForce MX330. As each manufacturer builds his/her own drivers and improvements in models which may be similar but stay different.
ATI Radeon X1600 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce MX330
API support
We are almost there. Soon you will find which graphics card is better – ATI Radeon X1600 XT or NVIDIA GeForce MX330! Here you learn a supported version of unified development standards of 3D DirectX and OpenGL.
Game Performance
Guys, to get which graphics card among ATI Radeon X1600 XT and NVIDIA GeForce MX330 works faster in games, it is enough to choose one from the list below and tap APPLY. In a comparative table, you learn a high-speed performance level of a graphics card on different screen resolutions, ranging from the lowest on to 4K. Colour palette helps you quickly pick the best option.
low
1280x720 |
med.
1920x1080 |
high
1920x1080 |
ultra
1920x1080 |
QHD
2560x1440 |
4K
3840x2160 |
||
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) | ATI Radeon X1600 XT | ||||||
NVIDIA GeForce MX330 | 27 | 13 | 11 | 9 | |||
Death Stranding (2020) | ATI Radeon X1600 XT | ||||||
NVIDIA GeForce MX330 | 33.4 | 14.7 | 13.7 | 13.4 | |||
F1 2020 (2020) | ATI Radeon X1600 XT | ||||||
NVIDIA GeForce MX330 | 81 | 39 | 28 | 16 | |||
Gears Tactics (2020) | ATI Radeon X1600 XT | ||||||
NVIDIA GeForce MX330 | 94.6 | 34.5 | 22.1 | 15.9 | |||
Doom Eternal (2020) | ATI Radeon X1600 XT | ||||||
NVIDIA GeForce MX330 | 35.3 |
Legend | |
5 | Stutter – How graphics cards operate in the game is being examined for the time being. As per interpolation of the similar graphics cards showing low frame rates, the game is possible to lag. |
May Stutter – How graphics cards operate in the game is being examined for the time being. As per interpolation of the similar graphics cards showing low frame rates, the game is possible to lag. | |
30 | Fluent – In considering all graphics benchmarks, the game speed is likely to be 25 fps or more. |
40 | Fluent – In considering all graphics benchmarks, the game speed is likely to be 35 fps or more. |
60 | Fluent – In considering all graphics benchmarks, the game speed is likely to be 58 fps or more. |
May Run Fluently – How graphics cards operate in the game is being examined for the time being. As per interpolation of the similar graphics cards showing low frame rates, the game is possible to lag. | |
? | Uncertain – The graphics card testing has revealed a slower card might ensure a high and stable frame rate. |
Uncertain – How graphics cards operate in the game is being examined for the time being. The interpolation in the same category is not possible. | |
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results. |
Advantages of ATI Radeon X1600 XT
102.36% faster in synthetic tests
Cheaper ($76 vs $1079)
More maximum RAM amount (256 MB vs 2 GB)
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce MX330
Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 90 nm)
Less power consumption (10 Watt vs 42 Watt)
More memory bandwidth (48.06 GB/s vs 22.08 GB/s)
Multi Monitor
So, ATI Radeon X1600 XT or NVIDIA GeForce MX330?
Which is one better to choose, NVIDIA or AMD? We recommend ATI Radeon X1600 XT .
ATI Radeon X1600 XT versus NVIDIA GeForce MX330 performance benchmarks comparison
3DMark Ice Storm is the only fully cross-platform benchmark that runs on all devices. It's great for comparing the 3D performance of smartphones, tablets, ultraportable laptops, and old or low-end PCs.
The 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test is designed for mid-range laptops and home PCs with integrated video graphics. The test uses the DirectX 11 engine, which is limited by Direct3D 10 capabilities. Accordingly, Cloud Gate is best suited for testing modern entry-level systems and legacy DX10-enabled GPUs.
Fire Strike, Fire Strike Extreme, Fire Strike Ultra. Fire Strike includes two graphics tests, a physics test and a combined test that stresses the CPU and GPU.
3DMark Fire Strike for Graphics Cards helps you determine performance in a state-of-the-art synthetic test that consists of two levels - physical and combined testing.
The result of the 3DMark 11 benchmark evaluation supports tessellation, compute shaders and graphics card multithreading will show which graphics card model is better and faster in games. The higher the score of the video card in the 3DMark 11 benchmark, the better.
Passmark is an effective benchmark that displays true results on the speed of data processing by GPU cores. We present the results of the evaluation of the performance of a video card in the modern Passmark benchmark, which evaluates the performance of a video card using its own rendering algorithms. The higher the score, the more powerful the graphics card.