AMD Radeon R9 280 vs Intel UHD Graphics 630

Comparing technical specs, games and benchmarks

AMD Radeon R9 280
VS
Intel UHD Graphics 630
VS

General Information

To quickly define the best graphics card comparing AMD Radeon R9 280 to Intel UHD Graphics 630, you can check an overall position in the performance rating which is computed by special formula and notes every benchmark. It is an average rate, so we recommend paying attention to all technical specifications.

184
Place in performance rating
516
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Generation 9.5
Tahiti
Code name
Comet Lake GT2
Desktop
Type
Desktop
4 March 2014
Release date
1 October 2017
$279
Launch price (MSRP)
reference
Design

Technical Specifications

The base technical info section helps you understand the difference between AMD Radeon R9 280 and Intel UHD Graphics 630. You will easily get which is more efficient following our tips; the best option is highlighted in different colours. If some specifications are identical, you should compare other features.

1792
Pipelines
184
no data
Core clock speed
300 MHz
933 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
4,313 million
Transistor count
189 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
200 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
104.5
Texture fill rate
26.45
3,344 gflops
Floating-point performance
460.8 gflops

Dimensions and Compatibility

Here you learn supported PCLe, graphics cards’ size and supplementary connectors which mainly high-performance models have. The technical information does not influence performance rating much.

PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
275 mm
Length
1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin
Supplementary power connectors
PCIe 3.0
Bus support

RAM Frequency and Speed

Integral RAM is applied for storage and data transmission. The higher graphic memory standards ism the faster and more efficient data proceeding, working or gaming processes are. Also, note please memory width and bandwidth. The higher figures are, the better it is.

GDDR5
Memory type
System Shared
3 GB
Maximum RAM amount
384 Bit
Memory bus width
1250 MHz
Memory clock speed
240 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
no data
Shared memory
+

Port and Display Support

Some graphics cards support supplementary display connectors. Here you see whether the compared models support the port.

2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
Display Connectors
No outputs
+
Eyefinity
+
HDMI

Technologies

Mind please this section provides the information and does not compute the overall performance while comparing AMD Radeon R9 280 and Intel UHD Graphics 630. As each manufacturer builds his/her own drivers and improvements in models which may be similar but stay different.

+
CrossFire
+
FreeSync
+
HD3D
+
LiquidVR
+
TressFX
+
TrueAudio
+
DDMA audio
+
UVD
no data
Quick Sync
+

API support

We are almost there. Soon you will find which graphics card is better – AMD Radeon R9 280 or Intel UHD Graphics 630! Here you learn a supported version of unified development standards of 3D DirectX and OpenGL.

DirectX® 12
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
+
Vulkan

Game Performance

Guys, to get which graphics card among AMD Radeon R9 280 and Intel UHD Graphics 630 works faster in games, it is enough to choose one from the list below and tap APPLY. In a comparative table, you learn a high-speed performance level of a graphics card on different screen resolutions, ranging from the lowest on to 4K. Colour palette helps you quickly pick the best option.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Radeon R9 280
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Radeon R9 280
Intel UHD Graphics 630
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Radeon R9 280
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Radeon R9 280
Intel UHD Graphics 630 38.1 13.2 7.5 5.4
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Radeon R9 280
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Legend
5 Stutter – How graphics cards operate in the game is being examined for the time being. As per interpolation of the similar graphics cards showing low frame rates, the game is possible to lag.
May Stutter – How graphics cards operate in the game is being examined for the time being. As per interpolation of the similar graphics cards showing low frame rates, the game is possible to lag.
30 Fluent – In considering all graphics benchmarks, the game speed is likely to be 25 fps or more.
40 Fluent – In considering all graphics benchmarks, the game speed is likely to be 35 fps or more.
60 Fluent – In considering all graphics benchmarks, the game speed is likely to be 58 fps or more.
May Run Fluently – How graphics cards operate in the game is being examined for the time being. As per interpolation of the similar graphics cards showing low frame rates, the game is possible to lag.
? Uncertain – The graphics card testing has revealed a slower card might ensure a high and stable frame rate.
Uncertain – How graphics cards operate in the game is being examined for the time being. The interpolation in the same category is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280

20.19% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (1792 vs 184)

Advantages of Intel UHD Graphics 630

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 28 nm)

Less power consumption (15 Watt vs 200 Watt)

G-SYNC support

VR Ready

Multi Monitor

So, AMD Radeon R9 280 or Intel UHD Graphics 630?

Which is one better to choose, NVIDIA or AMD? We recommend AMD Radeon R9 280 .

AMD Radeon R9 280 versus Intel UHD Graphics 630 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

Is the AMD Radeon R9 280 better than Intel UHD Graphics 630? - User Rating.

3.4 Out of 28 CMPtek Score
3.4 Out of 206 CMPtek Score