Comparing technical specs, games and benchmarks

AMD Cypress
VS
Intel UHD Graphics 600

AMD Cypress graphics card - clock speed / up to ,  memory - clock speed and bandwidth , TPD

Intel UHD Graphics 600 graphics card - clock speed 300 MHz / up to 750 MHz,  memory - clock speed and bandwidth , TPD 5 Watt

VS

AMD Cypress vs Intel UHD Graphics 600
General Information

To quickly define the best graphics card comparing AMD Cypress to Intel UHD Graphics 600, you can check an overall position in the performance rating which is computed by special formula and notes every benchmark. It is an average rate, so we recommend paying attention to all technical specifications.

not rated
Place in performance rating
962
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Gen. 9 Gemini Lake
Cypress
Code name
Gemini Lake GT1
Desktop
Type
Laptop
no data
Release date
11 December 2017 (4 years ago)
$20
Price now
$274
no data
Value for money
0.83
Cypress
GPU code name
Gemini Lake
Desktop
Market segment
Laptop

AMD Cypress vs Intel UHD Graphics 600
Technical Specifications

AMD Cypress vs Intel UHD Graphics 600. The base technical info section helps you understand the difference between AMD Cypress and Intel UHD Graphics 600. You will easily get which is more efficient following our tips; the best option is highlighted in different colours. If some specifications are identical, you should compare other features.

1600
Pipelines
96
no data
Core clock speed
300 MHz
no data
Boost Clock
750 MHz
2,154 million
Transistor count
189 million
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
5 Watt
no data
Texture fill rate
9.000
1600
Pipelines / CUDA cores
12
no data
Boost clock speed
700 MHz
2,154 million
Number of transistors
189 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
5 Watt

AMD Cypress vs Intel UHD Graphics 600
Dimensions and Compatibility

Here you learn supported PCLe, graphics cards’ size and supplementary connectors which mainly high-performance models have. The technical information does not influence performance rating much. AMD Cypress vs Intel UHD Graphics 600.

no data
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1

AMD Cypress vs Intel UHD Graphics 600
GPU RAM Frequency and Speed

Integral RAM is applied for storage and data transmission. The higher graphic memory standards ism the faster and more efficient data proceeding, working or gaming processes are. Also, note please memory width and bandwidth. The higher figures are, the better it is. AMD Cypress vs Intel UHD Graphics 600?

no data
Memory type
DDR4 / LPDDR4
no data
Memory bus width
64/128 Bit
no data
Shared memory
+

AMD Cypress vs Intel UHD Graphics 600
Port and Display Support

Some graphics cards support supplementary display connectors. Here you see whether the compared models support the port. AMD Cypress vs Intel UHD Graphics 600.

no data
Display Connectors
No outputs

AMD Cypress vs Intel UHD Graphics 600
Technologies

Mind please this section provides the information and does not compute the overall performance while comparing AMD Cypress and Intel UHD Graphics 600. As each manufacturer builds his/her own drivers and improvements in models which may be similar but stay different.

no data
Quick Sync
+

AMD Cypress vs Intel UHD Graphics 600
API support

We are almost there. Soon you will find which graphics card is better – AMD Cypress or Intel UHD Graphics 600! Here you learn a supported version of unified development standards of 3D DirectX and OpenGL.

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
Vulkan
+
5.0
Shader Model
6.4
1.2
OpenCL
2.1

AMD Cypress vs Intel UHD Graphics 600
Mining hashrates

192 Mh/s
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
no data

Game Performance

Guys, to get which graphics card among AMD Cypress and Intel UHD Graphics 600 works faster in games, it is enough to choose one from the list below and tap APPLY. In a comparative table, you learn a high-speed performance level of a graphics card on different screen resolutions, ranging from the lowest on to 4K. Colour palette helps you quickly pick the best option.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Cypress
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Cypress
Intel UHD Graphics 600
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Cypress
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Cypress
Intel UHD Graphics 600 5.1
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Cypress
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Legend
5 Stutter – How graphics cards operate in the game is being examined for the time being. As per interpolation of the similar graphics cards showing low frame rates, the game is possible to lag.
May Stutter – How graphics cards operate in the game is being examined for the time being. As per interpolation of the similar graphics cards showing low frame rates, the game is possible to lag.
30 Fluent – In considering all graphics benchmarks, the game speed is likely to be 25 fps or more.
40 Fluent – In considering all graphics benchmarks, the game speed is likely to be 35 fps or more.
60 Fluent – In considering all graphics benchmarks, the game speed is likely to be 58 fps or more.
May Run Fluently – How graphics cards operate in the game is being examined for the time being. As per interpolation of the similar graphics cards showing low frame rates, the game is possible to lag.
? Uncertain – The graphics card testing has revealed a slower card might ensure a high and stable frame rate.
Uncertain – How graphics cards operate in the game is being examined for the time being. The interpolation in the same category is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of AMD Cypress

Cheaper ($20 vs $274)

More pipelines (1600 vs 96)

Advantages of Intel UHD Graphics 600

0.98% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 40 nm)

So, AMD Cypress or Intel UHD Graphics 600?

Which is one better to choose, NVIDIA or AMD? We recommend Intel UHD Graphics 600 .

AMD Cypress versus Intel UHD Graphics 600 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

3DMark Ice Storm is the only fully cross-platform benchmark that runs on all devices. It's great for comparing the 3D performance of smartphones, tablets, ultraportable laptops, and old or low-end PCs.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

The 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test is designed for mid-range laptops and home PCs with integrated video graphics. The test uses the DirectX 11 engine, which is limited by Direct3D 10 capabilities. Accordingly, Cloud Gate is best suited for testing modern entry-level systems and legacy DX10-enabled GPUs.

3DMark Fire Strike Score

Fire Strike, Fire Strike Extreme, Fire Strike Ultra. Fire Strike includes two graphics tests, a physics test and a combined test that stresses the CPU and GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

3DMark Fire Strike for Graphics Cards helps you determine performance in a state-of-the-art synthetic test that consists of two levels - physical and combined testing.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

The result of the 3DMark 11 benchmark evaluation supports tessellation, compute shaders and graphics card multithreading will show which graphics card model is better and faster in games. The higher the score of the video card in the 3DMark 11 benchmark, the better.

Is the AMD Cypress better than Intel UHD Graphics 600? - User Rating.

0.0 Out of CMPTEK score
3.6 Out of CMPTEK score