Comparing technical specs, games and benchmarks

4x NVIDIA RTX A6000
VS
NVIDIA Quadro P520

4x NVIDIA RTX A6000 graphics card - clock speed 1410 MHz / up to 1800 MHz,  memory - clock speed 16000 MHz and bandwidth , TPD

NVIDIA Quadro P520 graphics card - clock speed 1303 MHz / up to 1493 MHz, 2 GB memory - clock speed 6000 MHz and bandwidth 48.06 GB/s, TPD

VS

4x NVIDIA RTX A6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P520
General Information

To quickly define the best graphics card comparing 4x NVIDIA RTX A6000 to NVIDIA Quadro P520, you can check an overall position in the performance rating which is computed by special formula and notes every benchmark. It is an average rate, so we recommend paying attention to all technical specifications.

31
Place in performance rating
471
no data
Value for money (0-100)
1.66
Ampere
Architecture
Pascal
no data
Type
Mobile workstation
no data
Release date
27 May 2019 (2 years ago)
no data
Price now
$1670
no data
Value for money
1.88
no data
GPU code name
GP108
Desktop
Market segment
Mobile workstation

4x NVIDIA RTX A6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P520
Technical Specifications

4x NVIDIA RTX A6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P520. The base technical info section helps you understand the difference between 4x NVIDIA RTX A6000 and NVIDIA Quadro P520. You will easily get which is more efficient following our tips; the best option is highlighted in different colours. If some specifications are identical, you should compare other features.

no data
Pipelines
384
1410 MHz
Core clock speed
1303 MHz
1800 MHz
Boost Clock
1493 MHz
no data
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
no data
Texture fill rate
35.83
10752
CUDA cores per GPU
no data
no data
Pipelines / CUDA cores
384
no data
Boost clock speed
1493 MHz
no data
Number of transistors
1,800 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
18 Watt

4x NVIDIA RTX A6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P520
Dimensions and Compatibility

Here you learn supported PCLe, graphics cards’ size and supplementary connectors which mainly high-performance models have. The technical information does not influence performance rating much. 4x NVIDIA RTX A6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P520.

no data
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
no data
Supplementary power connectors
None
no data
Laptop size
large

4x NVIDIA RTX A6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P520
GPU RAM Frequency and Speed

Integral RAM is applied for storage and data transmission. The higher graphic memory standards ism the faster and more efficient data proceeding, working or gaming processes are. Also, note please memory width and bandwidth. The higher figures are, the better it is. 4x NVIDIA RTX A6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P520?

GDDR6
Memory type
GDDR5
no data
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
384 Bit
Memory bus width
64 Bit
16000 MHz
Memory clock speed
6000 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
48.06 GB/s
no data
Shared memory
-

4x NVIDIA RTX A6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P520
Port and Display Support

Some graphics cards support supplementary display connectors. Here you see whether the compared models support the port. 4x NVIDIA RTX A6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P520.

no data
Display Connectors
No outputs

4x NVIDIA RTX A6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P520
Technologies

Mind please this section provides the information and does not compute the overall performance while comparing 4x NVIDIA RTX A6000 and NVIDIA Quadro P520. As each manufacturer builds his/her own drivers and improvements in models which may be similar but stay different.

no data
Multi Monitor
+
no data
CUDA
6.1

4x NVIDIA RTX A6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P520
API support

We are almost there. Soon you will find which graphics card is better – 4x NVIDIA RTX A6000 or NVIDIA Quadro P520! Here you learn a supported version of unified development standards of 3D DirectX and OpenGL.

12_2
DirectX
12 (12_1)
no data
OpenGL
4.6
no data
Vulkan
1.2.131
no data
Shader Model
6.4
no data
OpenCL
1.2

Game Performance

Guys, to get which graphics card among 4x NVIDIA RTX A6000 and NVIDIA Quadro P520 works faster in games, it is enough to choose one from the list below and tap APPLY. In a comparative table, you learn a high-speed performance level of a graphics card on different screen resolutions, ranging from the lowest on to 4K. Colour palette helps you quickly pick the best option.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) 4x NVIDIA RTX A6000
NVIDIA Quadro P520
Death Stranding (2020) 4x NVIDIA RTX A6000
NVIDIA Quadro P520
F1 2020 (2020) 4x NVIDIA RTX A6000
NVIDIA Quadro P520
Gears Tactics (2020) 4x NVIDIA RTX A6000
NVIDIA Quadro P520
Doom Eternal (2020) 4x NVIDIA RTX A6000
NVIDIA Quadro P520
Legend
5 Stutter – How graphics cards operate in the game is being examined for the time being. As per interpolation of the similar graphics cards showing low frame rates, the game is possible to lag.
May Stutter – How graphics cards operate in the game is being examined for the time being. As per interpolation of the similar graphics cards showing low frame rates, the game is possible to lag.
30 Fluent – In considering all graphics benchmarks, the game speed is likely to be 25 fps or more.
40 Fluent – In considering all graphics benchmarks, the game speed is likely to be 35 fps or more.
60 Fluent – In considering all graphics benchmarks, the game speed is likely to be 58 fps or more.
May Run Fluently – How graphics cards operate in the game is being examined for the time being. As per interpolation of the similar graphics cards showing low frame rates, the game is possible to lag.
? Uncertain – The graphics card testing has revealed a slower card might ensure a high and stable frame rate.
Uncertain – How graphics cards operate in the game is being examined for the time being. The interpolation in the same category is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of 4x NVIDIA RTX A6000

53.38% faster in synthetic tests

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro P520

Multi Monitor

So, 4x NVIDIA RTX A6000 or NVIDIA Quadro P520?

Which is one better to choose, NVIDIA or AMD? We recommend 4x NVIDIA RTX A6000 .

4x NVIDIA RTX A6000 versus NVIDIA Quadro P520 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

3DMark Ice Storm is the only fully cross-platform benchmark that runs on all devices. It's great for comparing the 3D performance of smartphones, tablets, ultraportable laptops, and old or low-end PCs.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

The 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test is designed for mid-range laptops and home PCs with integrated video graphics. The test uses the DirectX 11 engine, which is limited by Direct3D 10 capabilities. Accordingly, Cloud Gate is best suited for testing modern entry-level systems and legacy DX10-enabled GPUs.

3DMark Fire Strike Score

Fire Strike, Fire Strike Extreme, Fire Strike Ultra. Fire Strike includes two graphics tests, a physics test and a combined test that stresses the CPU and GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

3DMark Fire Strike for Graphics Cards helps you determine performance in a state-of-the-art synthetic test that consists of two levels - physical and combined testing.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

The result of the 3DMark 11 benchmark evaluation supports tessellation, compute shaders and graphics card multithreading will show which graphics card model is better and faster in games. The higher the score of the video card in the 3DMark 11 benchmark, the better.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage Performance reveals the real performance of video cards tested by users in their computers. Only the best graphics card deserves the highest score in the 3DMark Vantage Performance benchmark.

SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks

The SPECviewperf 12 benchmark with the 'Solidworks' scenario is an extended test of a graphics card. Video card performance in the SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks test is performed through 10 variants of 3D models and includes more than 50 scripts. Benchmark renders models: Audi R8, Black Owl, Digger, Ferrari, Menjac, SpaceShipCrawler and supercar.

SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX

Benchmark SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX is designed to test the performance of a video card in the 3D modeling mode of various objects (power unit, i.e. engine or SUV).

SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase

SPECviewperf 12 video card benchmark in 'Showcase' mode tests performance in rendering 3D models with shading and shadow projection effects.

SPECviewperf 12 - Medical

The SPECviewperf 12 GPU benchmark set with Medical scenario has two datasets: a 4D heart dataset consisting of multiple 3D volumes that repeat over time. They were obtained using a phase-contrast MRI scanner. The 80 MB dataset was provided by the Department of Radiology, Stanford School of Medicine and Lucille Packard Children's Hospital.

SPECviewperf 12 - Maya

The SPECviewperf 12 benchmark with the 'Maya' scripting suite was created in Autodesk software. SPECviewperf 12 'Maya' includes many rendering modes for the graphics card and contains various visual effects.

SPECviewperf 12 - Energy

GPU performance testing in the SPECviewperf 12 benchmark with the 'Energy' script set shows the real results of the video card performance in 3D simulation conditions.

SPECviewperf 12 - Creo

The SPECviewperf 12 benchmark in the ‘Creo’ script mode determines the speed of the GPU in the car and airplane rendering mode.

SPECviewperf 12 - Catia

The SPECviewperf 12 benchmark with the 'Catia' script set gives the results of the video card performance when simulating 3D objects (car, plane, SUV).

SPECviewperf 12 - 3ds Max

The SPECviewperf 12 benchmark with an updated version of the '3ds Max' script reflects the actual performance of the graphics card through rendering tests. The higher the SPECviewperf 12 score, the better the speed of the graphics card.

Passmark GPU

Passmark is an effective benchmark that displays true results on the speed of data processing by GPU cores. We present the results of the evaluation of the performance of a video card in the modern Passmark benchmark, which evaluates the performance of a video card using its own rendering algorithms. The higher the score, the more powerful the graphics card.

Is the 4x NVIDIA RTX A6000 better than NVIDIA Quadro P520? - User Rating.

0.0 Out of CMPTEK score
4.2 Out of CMPTEK score