Comparing technical specs and benchmarks

Samsung Exynos 4415
VS
Intel Celeron J4115

Samsung Exynos 4415 28nm - 1.50 GHz LPDDR2-400 

Intel Celeron J4115 14 nm - 1.80 GHz DDR4-2400 LPDDR4-2400 

VS

Samsung Exynos 4415 vs. Intel Celeron J4115
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In comparison between Samsung Exynos 4415 and Intel Celeron J4115, you should choose the model which has more cores and threads with base and turbo frequencies. All the features influence the system’s high-speed performance.

4 / 4
CPU Cores / Threads
4 / 4
normal
Core architecture
no data
--
A core
no data
--
B core
no data
--
C core
no data
No
Hyperthreading
No
No
Overclocking
No
1.50 GHz
Frequency
1.80 GHz
1.50 GHz
Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
2.50 GHz
1.50 GHz
Turbo Frequency (4 Cores)
2.40 GHz

Samsung Exynos 4415 vs. Intel Celeron J4115
CPU generation and family

4
CPU Cores
4
no data
Market price
ca. 75 $
Samsung Exynos 4415
Name
no data
Samsung Exynos
Family
no data
Samsung Exynos 4400
CPU group
no data
Utgard
Generation
9.5
Mobile
Segment
no data
--
Predecessor
no data
--
Successor
no data

Samsung Exynos 4415 vs. Intel Celeron J4115
Internal Graphics

Some manufacturers build a graphic core in many CPUs being an additional advantage. If you use a video card which is separated from a CPU, we recommend you skip this comparison as there is no need to compare Samsung Exynos 4415 to Intel Celeron J4115 across a built-in video card.

ARM Mali-400 MP4
GPU name
Intel UHD Graphics 600
0.53 GHz
GPU frequency
0.25 GHz
No turbo
GPU (Turbo)
0.70 GHz
4
Execution units
12
64
Shader
96
--
Max. GPU Memory
no data
1
Max. displays
3
Utgard
Generation
9.5
0
Direct X
12
28nm
Technology
14 nm
Q2/2008
Release date
Q4/2017

Samsung Exynos 4415 vs. Intel Celeron J4115
Hardware codec support

Pay attention to support of different technological options by CPUs. The general performance is not influenced. In the interest of time, you can skip this section.

no data
h265 8bit
Decode / Encode
no data
h265 10bit
Decode / Encode
No
h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
no data
No
h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
no data
No
h264
Decode / Encode
No
VP8
Decode / Encode
No
VP9
Decode / Encode
No
AV1
no data
No
AVC
Decode / Encode
No
VC-1
Decode
No
JPEG
Decode / Encode

Samsung Exynos 4415 vs. Intel Celeron J4115
Memory & PCIe

Modern CPUs support memory which operates in a multi-channel regime that provides high-speed data exchange and improves productivity. The higher the ram’s clock frequency, its standard (for example, DDR3, DDR4, DDR5) and maximum space in a system are, the better it is.

PCIe version
2.0
PCIe lanes
6
LPDDR2-400
Memory type
DDR4-2400 LPDDR4-2400
Max. Memory
8 GB
0
Memory channels
2
No
ECC
No
No
AES-NI
Yes

Samsung Exynos 4415 vs. Intel Celeron J4115
Thermal Management

High-performance and powerful CPUs require the essence of a good power supply. Here you learn how much TDP Samsung Exynos 4415 and Intel Celeron J4115 have. We recommend paying attention to the model which has lower TDP.

no data
TDP
10 W
--
TDP (PL2)
no data
--
TDP up
--
--
TDP down
--
--
Tjunction max.
--

Samsung Exynos 4415 vs. Intel Celeron J4115
Technical details

Here is the main information which can define the best CPU comparing technical specifications. Thus, the higher cash L2 and L3, the better it is. The lower the technological process of CPU production, the better it is. Another important factor is a production year that directly influences the manufacturer’s support terms and the opportunity of a system modernization at minimal cost in the future.

x86-32 (32 bit)
Instruction set (ISA)
no data
1.00 MB
L2-Cache
no data
--
L3-Cache
4.00 MB
Cortex-A9
Architecture
Gemini Lake Refresh
28 nm
Technology
14 nm
None
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
N/A
Socket
BGA 1090
2014
Release date
Q4/2019
--
Part Number
no data

Samsung Exynos 4415 vs. Intel Celeron J4115
Devices using this processor

In completing the comparison between Samsung Exynos 4415 and Intel Celeron J4115, you can learn in which computer systems these models are used.

Unknown
Used in
Unknown

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is Maxon’s actual benchmark for older processors versions that test the processor’s performance without hyperthreading in single-core mode.

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 benchmark reflects the efficiency of your processor operation in assessment mode. It works on Cinema 4 Suite software complex of the earlier version. Hyperthreading is not included.

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

A benchmark is designed to determine graphics cards’ performance and speed, built into their central processor. It works in iGPU mode, FP32 Performance. The higher the rate is, the better it is.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

A new approach to testing processor performance opens up the GeekBench 5 benchmark! A detailed under-load system analysis gives an accurate assessment of the quality. The higher the estimation is, the faster and more efficient the processor is. It is a version for testing a single core.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

A modern version of the GeekBench 5 benchmark reveals all opportunities and potential of your processor. As a result of testing, you can understand to what extent a processor is fast and efficient in operation with graphic apps or games.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench R11.5 is an outdated version of the benchmark for processors of earlier generations. To find out the potential or compare it with a modern processor model, it is enough to check the performance estimate. The higher it is, the better it is. Hyperthreading is not included.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R11.5 benchmark is designed for testing early-generation processors. The overall final performance is based on 3D scene simulations in Cinema 4 Suite. It engages all processor cores.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)

A classic benchmark is designed for testing the built-in graphics processor that works in the OpenGL standard.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

The authoritative benchmark PassMark shows how efficient the processor is in the overall performance rating. It takes into account the operation mode of all cores and supports hyperthreading. The benchmark is based on various scenarios for performing calculations, 2D and 3D modelling.