Samsung Exynos 3110 vs Intel Celeron J4115

Comparing technical specs and benchmarks

Samsung Exynos 3110
VS
Intel Celeron J4115
12121212
VS

Which to choose?

By comparing technical characteristics, you can easily take the best CPU. The most important specifications are highlighted green which influences the total CPU performance while working or playing games. It is time to compare Samsung Exynos 3110 to Intel Celeron J4115 and find out the difference between them.

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In comparison between Samsung Exynos 3110 and Intel Celeron J4115, you should choose the model which has more cores and threads with base and turbo frequencies. All the features influence the system’s high-speed performance.

1.00 GHz
Frequency
1.80 GHz
1
CPU Cores
4
1.00 GHz
Turbo (1 Core)
2.50 GHz
1
CPU Threads
4
No
Hyperthreading
No
No
Overclocking
No
Turbo (4 Cores)
2.40 GHz
No turbo
Turbo (1 Cores)
no data
normal
Core architecture
no data
--
A core
no data
--
B core
no data
--
C core
no data

Internal Graphics

Some manufacturers build a graphic core in many CPUs being an additional advantage. If you use a video card which is separated from a CPU, we recommend you skip this comparison as there is no need to compare Samsung Exynos 3110 to Intel Celeron J4115 across a built-in video card.

PowerVR SGX540
GPU name
Intel UHD Graphics 600
0.20 GHz
GPU frequency
0.25 GHz
0.20 GHz
GPU (Turbo)
0.70 GHz
Generation
9.5
10.1
DirectX Version
12
1
Execution units
12
0
Shader
96
Max. Memory
8 GB
1
Max. displays
3
45nm
Technology
14 nm
Q1/2008
Release date
Q4/2017
--
Max. GPU Memory
no data

Hardware codec support

Pay attention to support of different technological options by CPUs. The general performance is not influenced. In the interest of time, you can skip this section.

No
h264
Decode / Encode
No
JPEG
Decode / Encode
h265 8bit
Decode / Encode
h265 10bit
Decode / Encode
No
VP8
Decode / Encode
No
VP9
Decode / Encode
No
VC-1
Decode
No
AVC
Decode / Encode
No
h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
no data
No
h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
no data
No
AV1
no data

RAM and PCIe

Modern CPUs support memory which operates in a multi-channel regime that provides high-speed data exchange and improves productivity. The higher the ram’s clock frequency, its standard (for example, DDR3, DDR4, DDR5) and maximum space in a system are, the better it is.

LPDDR2-400
Memory type
DDR4-2400 LPDDR4-2400
Max. Memory
8 GB
2
Memory channels
2
No
ECC
No
PCIe version
2.0
PCIe lanes
6

Encryption

Learn if a CPU supports encryption data operation.

No
AES-NI
Yes

Thermal Management

High-performance and powerful CPUs require the essence of a good power supply. Here you learn how much TDP Samsung Exynos 3110 and Intel Celeron J4115 have. We recommend paying attention to the model which has lower TDP.

TDP
10 W
--
Tjunction max.
--
--
TDP up
--
--
TDP down
--
--
TDP (PL2)
no data

Technical details

Here is the main information which can define the best CPU comparing technical specifications. Thus, the higher cash L2 and L3, the better it is. The lower the technological process of CPU production, the better it is. Another important factor is a production year that directly influences the manufacturer’s support terms and the opportunity of a system modernization at minimal cost in the future.

--
L3-Cache
4.00 MB
45 nm
Technology
14 nm
Cortex-A8
Architecture
Gemini Lake Refresh
None
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
N/A
Socket
BGA 1090
2009
Release date
Q4/2019
Market price
ca. 75 $
x86-32 (32 bit)
Instruction set (ISA)
no data
0.50 MB
L2-Cache
no data
--
Part Number
no data

Devices using this processor

In completing the comparison between Samsung Exynos 3110 and Intel Celeron J4115, you can learn in which computer systems these models are used.

Samsung Google Nexus SSamsung Galaxy S 4G
Used in
Unknown

CPU generation and family

Samsung Exynos 3110
Name
no data
Mobile
Segment
no data
Samsung Exynos 3100
CPU group
no data
Samsung Exynos
Family
no data
4
Generation
no data
--
Predecessor
no data
--
Successor
no data

Boss

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is Maxon’s actual benchmark for older processors versions that test the processor’s performance without hyperthreading in single-core mode.

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 benchmark reflects the efficiency of your processor operation in assessment mode. It works on Cinema 4 Suite software complex of the earlier version. Hyperthreading is not included.

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

A benchmark is designed to determine graphics cards’ performance and speed, built into their central processor. It works in iGPU mode, FP32 Performance. The higher the rate is, the better it is.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

A new approach to testing processor performance opens up the GeekBench 5 benchmark! A detailed under-load system analysis gives an accurate assessment of the quality. The higher the estimation is, the faster and more efficient the processor is. It is a version for testing a single core.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

A modern version of the GeekBench 5 benchmark reveals all opportunities and potential of your processor. As a result of testing, you can understand to what extent a processor is fast and efficient in operation with graphic apps or games.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench R11.5 is an outdated version of the benchmark for processors of earlier generations. To find out the potential or compare it with a modern processor model, it is enough to check the performance estimate. The higher it is, the better it is. Hyperthreading is not included.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R11.5 benchmark is designed for testing early-generation processors. The overall final performance is based on 3D scene simulations in Cinema 4 Suite. It engages all processor cores.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)

A classic benchmark is designed for testing the built-in graphics processor that works in the OpenGL standard.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

The authoritative benchmark PassMark shows how efficient the processor is in the overall performance rating. It takes into account the operation mode of all cores and supports hyperthreading. The benchmark is based on various scenarios for performing calculations, 2D and 3D modelling.