Comparing technical specs and benchmarks

Intel Xeon Silver 4114T
VS
AMD A6-3620

Intel Xeon Silver 4114T  - 2.20 GHz DDR4-2400 

AMD A6-3620 32 nm - 2.20 GHz DDR3-1600 

VS

Intel Xeon Silver 4114T vs. AMD A6-3620
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In comparison between Intel Xeon Silver 4114T and AMD A6-3620, you should choose the model which has more cores and threads with base and turbo frequencies. All the features influence the system’s high-speed performance.

no data
Cores
4x
10 / 20
CPU Cores / Threads
4 / 4
normal
Core architecture
normal
0x
A core
no data
0x
B core
no data
Yes
Hyperthreading
No
No
Overclocking
Yes
2.20 GHz
Frequency
2.20 GHz
3.00 GHz
Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
2.50 GHz
no data
Turbo Frequency (4 Cores)
2.50 GHz
2.60 GHz
Turbo Frequency (10 Cores)
no data

Intel Xeon Silver 4114T vs. AMD A6-3620
CPU generation and family

10
CPU Cores
4
ca. 780 $
Market price
no data
Name
AMD A6-3620
no data
Family
AMD A
no data
CPU group
AMD A6-3000
Generation
3
no data
Segment
Desktop / Server
no data
Predecessor
--
no data
Successor
--

Intel Xeon Silver 4114T vs. AMD A6-3620
Internal Graphics

Some manufacturers build a graphic core in many CPUs being an additional advantage. If you use a video card which is separated from a CPU, we recommend you skip this comparison as there is no need to compare Intel Xeon Silver 4114T to AMD A6-3620 across a built-in video card.

GPU name
AMD Radeon HD 6530D
GPU frequency
0.44 GHz
No turbo
GPU (Turbo)
No turbo
Execution units
5
Shader
320
no data
Max. GPU Memory
1 GB
Generation
3
Direct X
11
Technology
32 nm
Release date
Q4/2010

Intel Xeon Silver 4114T vs. AMD A6-3620
Hardware codec support

Pay attention to support of different technological options by CPUs. The general performance is not influenced. In the interest of time, you can skip this section.

no data
h265 8bit
No
no data
h265 10bit
No
No
h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
No
No
h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
No
No
h264
Decode
No
VP8
No
No
VP9
No
No
AV1
No
No
AVC
Decode
No
VC-1
Decode
No
JPEG
Decode / Encode

Intel Xeon Silver 4114T vs. AMD A6-3620
Memory & PCIe

Modern CPUs support memory which operates in a multi-channel regime that provides high-speed data exchange and improves productivity. The higher the ram’s clock frequency, its standard (for example, DDR3, DDR4, DDR5) and maximum space in a system are, the better it is.

3.0
PCIe version
48
PCIe lanes
DDR4-2400
Memory type
DDR3-1600
6
Memory channels
2
no data
Bandwidth
--
Yes
ECC
No
Yes
AES-NI
Yes

Intel Xeon Silver 4114T vs. AMD A6-3620
Thermal Management

High-performance and powerful CPUs require the essence of a good power supply. Here you learn how much TDP Intel Xeon Silver 4114T and AMD A6-3620 have. We recommend paying attention to the model which has lower TDP.

no data
TDP
65 W
85 W
TDP (PL1)
65 W
--
TDP (PL2)
--
--
TDP up
--
--
TDP down
--
--
Tjunction max.
--

Intel Xeon Silver 4114T vs. AMD A6-3620
Technical details

Here is the main information which can define the best CPU comparing technical specifications. Thus, the higher cash L2 and L3, the better it is. The lower the technological process of CPU production, the better it is. Another important factor is a production year that directly influences the manufacturer’s support terms and the opportunity of a system modernization at minimal cost in the future.

x86-64 (64 bit)
Instruction set (ISA)
x86-64 (64 bit)
no data
ISA extensions
SSE3, SSE4a
--
L2-Cache
--
14.00 MB
L3-Cache
4.00 MB
Skylake SP
Architecture
Llano
14 nm
Technology
32 nm
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d, vPro
Virtualization
AMD-V
LGA 3647
Socket
FM1
Q3/2017
Release date
Q4/2011
no data
Part Number
--

Intel Xeon Silver 4114T vs. AMD A6-3620
Devices using this processor

In completing the comparison between Intel Xeon Silver 4114T and AMD A6-3620, you can learn in which computer systems these models are used.

Unknown
Used in
Unknown

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

A benchmark is designed to determine graphics cards’ performance and speed, built into their central processor. It works in iGPU mode, FP32 Performance. The higher the rate is, the better it is.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

A new approach to testing processor performance opens up the GeekBench 5 benchmark! A detailed under-load system analysis gives an accurate assessment of the quality. The higher the estimation is, the faster and more efficient the processor is. It is a version for testing a single core.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

A modern version of the GeekBench 5 benchmark reveals all opportunities and potential of your processor. As a result of testing, you can understand to what extent a processor is fast and efficient in operation with graphic apps or games.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

To define how efficient and powerful a processor is among several models or in comparison with another, we recommend paying attention to Geekbench 3 benchmark, which tests the single-core processor performance.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

To reveal the whole potential of the equipment, the Geekbench 3 benchmark uses all cores for 64bit models in a specialised software complex that imitates modelling various 3D scenarios. The higher estimation is, the better the performance is.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

The authoritative benchmark PassMark shows how efficient the processor is in the overall performance rating. It takes into account the operation mode of all cores and supports hyperthreading. The benchmark is based on various scenarios for performing calculations, 2D and 3D modelling.