Comparing technical specs and benchmarks

Intel Xeon Silver 4114
VS
Intel Core i9-10900T

Intel Xeon Silver 4114  - 2.20 GHz DDR4-2400 

Intel Core i9-10900T 14 nm - 1.90 GHz DDR4-2933 

VS

Intel Xeon Silver 4114 vs. Intel Core i9-10900T
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In comparison between Intel Xeon Silver 4114 and Intel Core i9-10900T, you should choose the model which has more cores and threads with base and turbo frequencies. All the features influence the system’s high-speed performance.

10 / 20
CPU Cores / Threads
10 / 20
normal
Core architecture
no data
0x
A core
no data
0x
B core
no data
Yes
Hyperthreading
Yes
No
Overclocking
No
2.20 GHz
Frequency
1.90 GHz
3.00 GHz
Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
4.60 GHz
2.60 GHz
Turbo Frequency (10 Cores)
3.70 GHz

Intel Xeon Silver 4114 vs. Intel Core i9-10900T
CPU generation and family

10
CPU Cores
10
ca. 780 $
Market price
ca. 439 $
Generation
9.5

Intel Xeon Silver 4114 vs. Intel Core i9-10900T
Internal Graphics

Some manufacturers build a graphic core in many CPUs being an additional advantage. If you use a video card which is separated from a CPU, we recommend you skip this comparison as there is no need to compare Intel Xeon Silver 4114 to Intel Core i9-10900T across a built-in video card.

GPU name
Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU frequency
0.35 GHz
No turbo
GPU (Turbo)
1.20 GHz
Execution units
24
Shader
192
Max. displays
3
Generation
9.5
Direct X
12
Technology
14 nm
Release date
Q4/2017

Intel Xeon Silver 4114 vs. Intel Core i9-10900T
Hardware codec support

Pay attention to support of different technological options by CPUs. The general performance is not influenced. In the interest of time, you can skip this section.

no data
h265 8bit
Decode / Encode
no data
h265 10bit
Decode / Encode
No
h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
no data
No
h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
no data
No
h264
Decode / Encode
No
VP8
Decode / Encode
No
VP9
Decode / Encode
No
AV1
no data
No
AVC
Decode / Encode
No
VC-1
Decode
No
JPEG
Decode / Encode

Intel Xeon Silver 4114 vs. Intel Core i9-10900T
Memory & PCIe

Modern CPUs support memory which operates in a multi-channel regime that provides high-speed data exchange and improves productivity. The higher the ram’s clock frequency, its standard (for example, DDR3, DDR4, DDR5) and maximum space in a system are, the better it is.

3.0
PCIe version
3.0
48
PCIe lanes
16
DDR4-2400
Memory type
DDR4-2933
Max. Memory
128 GB
6
Memory channels
2
Yes
ECC
No
Yes
AES-NI
Yes

Intel Xeon Silver 4114 vs. Intel Core i9-10900T
Thermal Management

High-performance and powerful CPUs require the essence of a good power supply. Here you learn how much TDP Intel Xeon Silver 4114 and Intel Core i9-10900T have. We recommend paying attention to the model which has lower TDP.

no data
TDP
35 W
85 W
TDP (PL1)
no data
--
TDP (PL2)
no data
--
TDP up
--
--
TDP down
--
--
Tjunction max.
100 °C

Intel Xeon Silver 4114 vs. Intel Core i9-10900T
Technical details

Here is the main information which can define the best CPU comparing technical specifications. Thus, the higher cash L2 and L3, the better it is. The lower the technological process of CPU production, the better it is. Another important factor is a production year that directly influences the manufacturer’s support terms and the opportunity of a system modernization at minimal cost in the future.

x86-64 (64 bit)
Instruction set (ISA)
no data
--
L2-Cache
no data
14.00 MB
L3-Cache
20.00 MB
Skylake SP
Architecture
Comet Lake
14 nm
Technology
14 nm
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d, vPro
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
LGA 3647
Socket
LGA 1200
Q3/2017
Release date
Q2/2020

Intel Xeon Silver 4114 vs. Intel Core i9-10900T
Devices using this processor

In completing the comparison between Intel Xeon Silver 4114 and Intel Core i9-10900T, you can learn in which computer systems these models are used.

Unknown
Used in
Unknown

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

The version, having become a gold standard of a synthetic benchmark, allows accurately define a CPU performance in Cinema 4 Suite software complex. The most points mean a model’s best efficiency. Hyperthreading is not included.

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

It is a testing performance standard of CPU by Maxon. It is a specialized multi-platform number of tests that estimate the power of all processor cores in rendering mode.

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is Maxon’s actual benchmark for older processors versions that test the processor’s performance without hyperthreading in single-core mode.

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 benchmark reflects the efficiency of your processor operation in assessment mode. It works on Cinema 4 Suite software complex of the earlier version. Hyperthreading is not included.

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

A benchmark is designed to determine graphics cards’ performance and speed, built into their central processor. It works in iGPU mode, FP32 Performance. The higher the rate is, the better it is.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

A new approach to testing processor performance opens up the GeekBench 5 benchmark! A detailed under-load system analysis gives an accurate assessment of the quality. The higher the estimation is, the faster and more efficient the processor is. It is a version for testing a single core.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

A modern version of the GeekBench 5 benchmark reveals all opportunities and potential of your processor. As a result of testing, you can understand to what extent a processor is fast and efficient in operation with graphic apps or games.