Comparing technical specs and benchmarks

Intel Xeon Silver 4114
VS
Intel Core i5-9600K

Intel Xeon Silver 4114  - 2.20 GHz DDR4-2400 

Intel Core i5-9600K 14 nm - 3.70 GHz DDR4-2666 

VS

Intel Xeon Silver 4114 vs. Intel Core i5-9600K
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In comparison between Intel Xeon Silver 4114 and Intel Core i5-9600K, you should choose the model which has more cores and threads with base and turbo frequencies. All the features influence the system’s high-speed performance.

10 / 20
CPU Cores / Threads
6 / 6
normal
Core architecture
0x
A core
0x
B core
Yes
Hyperthreading
No
No
Overclocking
Yes
2.20 GHz
Frequency
3.70 GHz
3.00 GHz
Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
no data
Turbo Frequency (6 Cores)
4.30 GHz
2.60 GHz
Turbo Frequency (10 Cores)

Intel Xeon Silver 4114 vs. Intel Core i5-9600K
CPU generation and family

10
CPU Cores
6
ca. 780 $
Market price
ca. 260 $
Generation
9.5

Intel Xeon Silver 4114 vs. Intel Core i5-9600K
Internal Graphics

Some manufacturers build a graphic core in many CPUs being an additional advantage. If you use a video card which is separated from a CPU, we recommend you skip this comparison as there is no need to compare Intel Xeon Silver 4114 to Intel Core i5-9600K across a built-in video card.

GPU name
Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU frequency
0.35 GHz
No turbo
GPU (Turbo)
1.15 GHz
Execution units
24
Shader
192
Max. displays
3
Generation
9.5
Direct X
12
Technology
14 nm
Release date
Q4/2017

Intel Xeon Silver 4114 vs. Intel Core i5-9600K
Hardware codec support

Pay attention to support of different technological options by CPUs. The general performance is not influenced. In the interest of time, you can skip this section.

no data
h265 8bit
Decode / Encode
no data
h265 10bit
Decode / Encode
No
h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
No
h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
No
h264
Decode / Encode
No
VP8
Decode / Encode
No
VP9
Decode / Encode
No
AV1
No
AVC
Decode / Encode
No
VC-1
Decode
No
JPEG
Decode / Encode

Intel Xeon Silver 4114 vs. Intel Core i5-9600K
Memory & PCIe

Modern CPUs support memory which operates in a multi-channel regime that provides high-speed data exchange and improves productivity. The higher the ram’s clock frequency, its standard (for example, DDR3, DDR4, DDR5) and maximum space in a system are, the better it is.

3.0
PCIe version
3.0
48
PCIe lanes
16
DDR4-2400
Memory type
DDR4-2666
Max. Memory
128 GB
6
Memory channels
2
Yes
ECC
No
Yes
AES-NI
Yes

Intel Xeon Silver 4114 vs. Intel Core i5-9600K
Thermal Management

High-performance and powerful CPUs require the essence of a good power supply. Here you learn how much TDP Intel Xeon Silver 4114 and Intel Core i5-9600K have. We recommend paying attention to the model which has lower TDP.

no data
TDP
95 W
85 W
TDP (PL1)
--
TDP (PL2)
--
TDP up
--
--
TDP down
--
--
Tjunction max.
100 °C

Intel Xeon Silver 4114 vs. Intel Core i5-9600K
Technical details

Here is the main information which can define the best CPU comparing technical specifications. Thus, the higher cash L2 and L3, the better it is. The lower the technological process of CPU production, the better it is. Another important factor is a production year that directly influences the manufacturer’s support terms and the opportunity of a system modernization at minimal cost in the future.

x86-64 (64 bit)
Instruction set (ISA)
EM64T
--
L2-Cache
1.50 MB
14.00 MB
L3-Cache
9.00 MB
Skylake SP
Architecture
Coffee Lake Refresh
14 nm
Technology
14 nm
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d, vPro
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
LGA 3647
Socket
LGA 1151-2
Q3/2017
Release date
Q4/2018
no data
Part Number
BX80684I59600K

Intel Xeon Silver 4114 vs. Intel Core i5-9600K
Devices using this processor

In completing the comparison between Intel Xeon Silver 4114 and Intel Core i5-9600K, you can learn in which computer systems these models are used.

Unknown
Used in
Multimedia, Office PC

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

The version, having become a gold standard of a synthetic benchmark, allows accurately define a CPU performance in Cinema 4 Suite software complex. The most points mean a model’s best efficiency. Hyperthreading is not included.

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

It is the most actual version of the Cinebench R23 benchmark for testing processors in the single-core using mode. Like all the company’s versions, it uses a brand app for testing.

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

It is a testing performance standard of CPU by Maxon. It is a specialized multi-platform number of tests that estimate the power of all processor cores in rendering mode.

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

The updated version of the Cinebench R23 benchmark shows an accurate performance assessment given all modern standards and apps requirements. It works in a loading mode of all cores and threads.

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is Maxon’s actual benchmark for older processors versions that test the processor’s performance without hyperthreading in single-core mode.

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 benchmark reflects the efficiency of your processor operation in assessment mode. It works on Cinema 4 Suite software complex of the earlier version. Hyperthreading is not included.

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

A benchmark is designed to determine graphics cards’ performance and speed, built into their central processor. It works in iGPU mode, FP32 Performance. The higher the rate is, the better it is.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

A new approach to testing processor performance opens up the GeekBench 5 benchmark! A detailed under-load system analysis gives an accurate assessment of the quality. The higher the estimation is, the faster and more efficient the processor is. It is a version for testing a single core.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

A modern version of the GeekBench 5 benchmark reveals all opportunities and potential of your processor. As a result of testing, you can understand to what extent a processor is fast and efficient in operation with graphic apps or games.

Blender 2.81 (bmw27)

Universal benchmark Blender 2.81 (bmw27) starts processor testing in rendering animated 3D images. The faster the processor copes with the task, the higher the overall performance estimation is.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

To define how efficient and powerful a processor is among several models or in comparison with another, we recommend paying attention to Geekbench 3 benchmark, which tests the single-core processor performance.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

To reveal the whole potential of the equipment, the Geekbench 3 benchmark uses all cores for 64bit models in a specialised software complex that imitates modelling various 3D scenarios. The higher estimation is, the better the performance is.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench R11.5 is an outdated version of the benchmark for processors of earlier generations. To find out the potential or compare it with a modern processor model, it is enough to check the performance estimate. The higher it is, the better it is. Hyperthreading is not included.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R11.5 benchmark is designed for testing early-generation processors. The overall final performance is based on 3D scene simulations in Cinema 4 Suite. It engages all processor cores.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)

A classic benchmark is designed for testing the built-in graphics processor that works in the OpenGL standard.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

The authoritative benchmark PassMark shows how efficient the processor is in the overall performance rating. It takes into account the operation mode of all cores and supports hyperthreading. The benchmark is based on various scenarios for performing calculations, 2D and 3D modelling.

Monero Hashrate kH/s

The possibility of the cryptocurrency Monero mining is being tested using a processor. Scenarios have been performed in OS Hive and boosted by XMRig v6.x.