Comparing technical specs and benchmarks

Intel Xeon Gold 6348H
VS
AMD A6-9210

Intel Xeon Gold 6348H  - 2.30 GHz DDR4-2933 

AMD A6-9210 28 nm - 2.40 GHz DDR4-2133 

VS

Intel Xeon Gold 6348H vs. AMD A6-9210
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In comparison between Intel Xeon Gold 6348H and AMD A6-9210, you should choose the model which has more cores and threads with base and turbo frequencies. All the features influence the system’s high-speed performance.

no data
Cores
2x
24 / 48
CPU Cores / Threads
2 / 2
normal
Core architecture
normal
0x
A core
no data
0x
B core
no data
Yes
Hyperthreading
No
No
Overclocking
No
2.30 GHz
Frequency
2.40 GHz
4.20 GHz
Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
2.80 GHz
no data
Turbo Frequency (2 Cores)
2.60 GHz
2.60 GHz
Turbo Frequency (24 Cores)
no data

Intel Xeon Gold 6348H vs. AMD A6-9210
CPU generation and family

24
CPU Cores
2
no data
Name
AMD A6-9210
no data
Family
AMD A
no data
CPU group
AMD A6-9000
Generation
7
no data
Segment
Mobile
no data
Predecessor
--
no data
Successor
--

Intel Xeon Gold 6348H vs. AMD A6-9210
Internal Graphics

Some manufacturers build a graphic core in many CPUs being an additional advantage. If you use a video card which is separated from a CPU, we recommend you skip this comparison as there is no need to compare Intel Xeon Gold 6348H to AMD A6-9210 across a built-in video card.

GPU name
AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
GPU frequency
0.60 GHz
No turbo
GPU (Turbo)
No turbo
Execution units
3
Shader
192
no data
Max. GPU Memory
2 GB
Max. displays
3
Generation
7
Direct X
12
Technology
28 nm
Release date
Q2/2016

Intel Xeon Gold 6348H vs. AMD A6-9210
Hardware codec support

Pay attention to support of different technological options by CPUs. The general performance is not influenced. In the interest of time, you can skip this section.

no data
h265 8bit
Decode
no data
h265 10bit
Decode
No
h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
Decode
No
h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
Decode
No
h264
Decode
No
VP8
Decode
No
VP9
Decode
No
AV1
No
No
AVC
Decode / Encode
No
VC-1
Decode
No
JPEG
Decode / Encode

Intel Xeon Gold 6348H vs. AMD A6-9210
Memory & PCIe

Modern CPUs support memory which operates in a multi-channel regime that provides high-speed data exchange and improves productivity. The higher the ram’s clock frequency, its standard (for example, DDR3, DDR4, DDR5) and maximum space in a system are, the better it is.

3.0
PCIe version
3.0
48
PCIe lanes
8
DDR4-2933
Memory type
DDR4-2133
1152 GB
Max. Memory
8 GB
6
Memory channels
1
no data
Bandwidth
--
Yes
ECC
No
no data
PCIe
3.0 x 8
Yes
AES-NI
Yes

Intel Xeon Gold 6348H vs. AMD A6-9210
Thermal Management

High-performance and powerful CPUs require the essence of a good power supply. Here you learn how much TDP Intel Xeon Gold 6348H and AMD A6-9210 have. We recommend paying attention to the model which has lower TDP.

no data
TDP
15 W
165 W
TDP (PL1)
15 W
--
TDP (PL2)
--
--
TDP up
--
--
TDP down
10 W
--
Tjunction max.
90 °C

Intel Xeon Gold 6348H vs. AMD A6-9210
Technical details

Here is the main information which can define the best CPU comparing technical specifications. Thus, the higher cash L2 and L3, the better it is. The lower the technological process of CPU production, the better it is. Another important factor is a production year that directly influences the manufacturer’s support terms and the opportunity of a system modernization at minimal cost in the future.

x86-64 (64 bit)
Instruction set (ISA)
x86-64 (64 bit)
no data
ISA extensions
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4
--
L2-Cache
--
33.00 MB
L3-Cache
2.00 MB
Cooper Lake
Architecture
Stoney Ridge (Excavator)
14 nm
Technology
28 nm
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d, vPro
Virtualization
AMD-V, AMD-Vi
P+
Socket
FP4
Q2/2020
Release date
Q2/2017
no data
Part Number
--

Intel Xeon Gold 6348H vs. AMD A6-9210
Devices using this processor

In completing the comparison between Intel Xeon Gold 6348H and AMD A6-9210, you can learn in which computer systems these models are used.

Unknown
Used in
Unknown

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

A benchmark is designed to determine graphics cards’ performance and speed, built into their central processor. It works in iGPU mode, FP32 Performance. The higher the rate is, the better it is.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

A new approach to testing processor performance opens up the GeekBench 5 benchmark! A detailed under-load system analysis gives an accurate assessment of the quality. The higher the estimation is, the faster and more efficient the processor is. It is a version for testing a single core.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

A modern version of the GeekBench 5 benchmark reveals all opportunities and potential of your processor. As a result of testing, you can understand to what extent a processor is fast and efficient in operation with graphic apps or games.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

The authoritative benchmark PassMark shows how efficient the processor is in the overall performance rating. It takes into account the operation mode of all cores and supports hyperthreading. The benchmark is based on various scenarios for performing calculations, 2D and 3D modelling.