Comparing technical specs and benchmarks

Intel Xeon Gold 6328H
VS
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT

Intel Xeon Gold 6328H  - 2.80 GHz DDR4-2933 

AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT  - 4.10 GHz DDR4-1600, 3200 

VS

Intel Xeon Gold 6328H vs. AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In comparison between Intel Xeon Gold 6328H and AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT, you should choose the model which has more cores and threads with base and turbo frequencies. All the features influence the system’s high-speed performance.

16 / 32
CPU Cores / Threads
12 / 24
normal
Core architecture
0x
A core
0x
B core
Yes
Hyperthreading
Yes
No
Overclocking
Yes
2.80 GHz
Frequency
4.10 GHz
4.30 GHz
Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
no data
Turbo Frequency (12 Cores)
4.60 GHz
3.00 GHz
Turbo Frequency (16 Cores)

Intel Xeon Gold 6328H vs. AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
CPU generation and family

16
CPU Cores
12
Market price
ca. 636$

Intel Xeon Gold 6328H vs. AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
Internal Graphics

Some manufacturers build a graphic core in many CPUs being an additional advantage. If you use a video card which is separated from a CPU, we recommend you skip this comparison as there is no need to compare Intel Xeon Gold 6328H to AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT across a built-in video card.

No turbo
GPU (Turbo)
No turbo

Intel Xeon Gold 6328H vs. AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
Hardware codec support

Pay attention to support of different technological options by CPUs. The general performance is not influenced. In the interest of time, you can skip this section.

no data
h265 8bit
No
no data
h265 10bit
No
No
h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
No
h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
No
h264
No
No
VP8
No
No
VP9
No
No
AV1
No
AVC
No
No
VC-1
No
No
JPEG
No

Intel Xeon Gold 6328H vs. AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
Memory & PCIe

Modern CPUs support memory which operates in a multi-channel regime that provides high-speed data exchange and improves productivity. The higher the ram’s clock frequency, its standard (for example, DDR3, DDR4, DDR5) and maximum space in a system are, the better it is.

3.0
PCIe version
4.0
48
PCIe lanes
20
DDR4-2933
Memory type
DDR4-1600, 3200
1152 GB
Max. Memory
128 GB
6
Memory channels
2
Yes
ECC
Yes
Yes
AES-NI
Yes

Intel Xeon Gold 6328H vs. AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
Thermal Management

High-performance and powerful CPUs require the essence of a good power supply. Here you learn how much TDP Intel Xeon Gold 6328H and AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT have. We recommend paying attention to the model which has lower TDP.

no data
TDP
105 W
165 W
TDP (PL1)
--
TDP (PL2)
--
TDP up
--
--
TDP down
--
--
Tjunction max.
95 °C

Intel Xeon Gold 6328H vs. AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
Technical details

Here is the main information which can define the best CPU comparing technical specifications. Thus, the higher cash L2 and L3, the better it is. The lower the technological process of CPU production, the better it is. Another important factor is a production year that directly influences the manufacturer’s support terms and the opportunity of a system modernization at minimal cost in the future.

x86-64 (64 bit)
Instruction set (ISA)
AMD64
--
L2-Cache
6.00 MB
22.00 MB
L3-Cache
64.00 MB
Cooper Lake
Architecture
Zen 2 Refresh
14 nm
Technology
7 nm Matisse
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d, vPro
Virtualization
AMD-V, SEV
P+
Socket
AM4
Q2/2020
Release date
Q2/2020
no data
Part Number
100-100000277WOF

Intel Xeon Gold 6328H vs. AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
Devices using this processor

In completing the comparison between Intel Xeon Gold 6328H and AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT, you can learn in which computer systems these models are used.

Unknown
Used in
Gaming PC

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

The version, having become a gold standard of a synthetic benchmark, allows accurately define a CPU performance in Cinema 4 Suite software complex. The most points mean a model’s best efficiency. Hyperthreading is not included.

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

It is the most actual version of the Cinebench R23 benchmark for testing processors in the single-core using mode. Like all the company’s versions, it uses a brand app for testing.

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

It is a testing performance standard of CPU by Maxon. It is a specialized multi-platform number of tests that estimate the power of all processor cores in rendering mode.

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

The updated version of the Cinebench R23 benchmark shows an accurate performance assessment given all modern standards and apps requirements. It works in a loading mode of all cores and threads.

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is Maxon’s actual benchmark for older processors versions that test the processor’s performance without hyperthreading in single-core mode.

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 benchmark reflects the efficiency of your processor operation in assessment mode. It works on Cinema 4 Suite software complex of the earlier version. Hyperthreading is not included.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

A new approach to testing processor performance opens up the GeekBench 5 benchmark! A detailed under-load system analysis gives an accurate assessment of the quality. The higher the estimation is, the faster and more efficient the processor is. It is a version for testing a single core.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

A modern version of the GeekBench 5 benchmark reveals all opportunities and potential of your processor. As a result of testing, you can understand to what extent a processor is fast and efficient in operation with graphic apps or games.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

The authoritative benchmark PassMark shows how efficient the processor is in the overall performance rating. It takes into account the operation mode of all cores and supports hyperthreading. The benchmark is based on various scenarios for performing calculations, 2D and 3D modelling.

Monero Hashrate kH/s

The possibility of the cryptocurrency Monero mining is being tested using a processor. Scenarios have been performed in OS Hive and boosted by XMRig v6.x.