Comparing technical specs and benchmarks

Intel Xeon Gold 5215
VS
Intel Xeon Platinum 8168

Intel Xeon Gold 5215  - 2.50 GHz DDR4-2666 

Intel Xeon Platinum 8168  - 2.70 GHz DDR4-2666 

VS

Intel Xeon Gold 5215 vs. Intel Xeon Platinum 8168
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In comparison between Intel Xeon Gold 5215 and Intel Xeon Platinum 8168, you should choose the model which has more cores and threads with base and turbo frequencies. All the features influence the system’s high-speed performance.

10 / 20
CPU Cores / Threads
24 / 48
normal
Core architecture
normal
0x
A core
0x
0x
B core
0x
Yes
Hyperthreading
Yes
No
Overclocking
No
2.50 GHz
Frequency
2.70 GHz
3.40 GHz
Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
3.70 GHz
2.50 GHz
Turbo Frequency (10 Cores)
no data
no data
Turbo Frequency (24 Cores)
3.00 GHz

Intel Xeon Gold 5215 vs. Intel Xeon Platinum 8168
CPU generation and family

10
CPU Cores
24
ca. 1221 $
Market price
ca. 5900 $

Intel Xeon Gold 5215 vs. Intel Xeon Platinum 8168
Internal Graphics

Some manufacturers build a graphic core in many CPUs being an additional advantage. If you use a video card which is separated from a CPU, we recommend you skip this comparison as there is no need to compare Intel Xeon Gold 5215 to Intel Xeon Platinum 8168 across a built-in video card.

No turbo
GPU (Turbo)
No turbo

Intel Xeon Gold 5215 vs. Intel Xeon Platinum 8168
Hardware codec support

Pay attention to support of different technological options by CPUs. The general performance is not influenced. In the interest of time, you can skip this section.

No
h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
No
No
h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
No
No
h264
No
No
VP8
No
No
VP9
No
No
AV1
No
No
AVC
No
No
VC-1
No
No
JPEG
No

Intel Xeon Gold 5215 vs. Intel Xeon Platinum 8168
Memory & PCIe

Modern CPUs support memory which operates in a multi-channel regime that provides high-speed data exchange and improves productivity. The higher the ram’s clock frequency, its standard (for example, DDR3, DDR4, DDR5) and maximum space in a system are, the better it is.

3.0
PCIe version
3.0
48
PCIe lanes
48
DDR4-2666
Memory type
DDR4-2666
6
Memory channels
6
Yes
ECC
Yes
Yes
AES-NI
Yes

Intel Xeon Gold 5215 vs. Intel Xeon Platinum 8168
Thermal Management

High-performance and powerful CPUs require the essence of a good power supply. Here you learn how much TDP Intel Xeon Gold 5215 and Intel Xeon Platinum 8168 have. We recommend paying attention to the model which has lower TDP.

85 W
TDP (PL1)
205 W
--
TDP (PL2)
--
--
TDP up
--
--
TDP down
--
--
Tjunction max.
--

Intel Xeon Gold 5215 vs. Intel Xeon Platinum 8168
Technical details

Here is the main information which can define the best CPU comparing technical specifications. Thus, the higher cash L2 and L3, the better it is. The lower the technological process of CPU production, the better it is. Another important factor is a production year that directly influences the manufacturer’s support terms and the opportunity of a system modernization at minimal cost in the future.

x86-64 (64 bit)
Instruction set (ISA)
x86-64 (64 bit)
--
L2-Cache
--
13.75 MB
L3-Cache
33.00 MB
Cascade Lake
Architecture
Skylake SP
14 nm
Technology
14 nm
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d, vPro
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d, vPro
LGA 3647
Socket
LGA 3647
Q2/2019
Release date
Q3/2017

Intel Xeon Gold 5215 vs. Intel Xeon Platinum 8168
Devices using this processor

In completing the comparison between Intel Xeon Gold 5215 and Intel Xeon Platinum 8168, you can learn in which computer systems these models are used.

Unknown
Used in
Unknown

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 benchmark reflects the efficiency of your processor operation in assessment mode. It works on Cinema 4 Suite software complex of the earlier version. Hyperthreading is not included.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

To reveal the whole potential of the equipment, the Geekbench 3 benchmark uses all cores for 64bit models in a specialised software complex that imitates modelling various 3D scenarios. The higher estimation is, the better the performance is.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R11.5 benchmark is designed for testing early-generation processors. The overall final performance is based on 3D scene simulations in Cinema 4 Suite. It engages all processor cores.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

The authoritative benchmark PassMark shows how efficient the processor is in the overall performance rating. It takes into account the operation mode of all cores and supports hyperthreading. The benchmark is based on various scenarios for performing calculations, 2D and 3D modelling.