Comparing technical specs and benchmarks

Intel Pentium Gold G5600
VS
AMD Epyc 7702

Intel Pentium Gold G5600 14 nm - 3.90 GHz DDR4-2400 

AMD Epyc 7702  - 2.00 GHz DDR4-3200 

VS

Intel Pentium Gold G5600 vs. AMD Epyc 7702
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In comparison between Intel Pentium Gold G5600 and AMD Epyc 7702, you should choose the model which has more cores and threads with base and turbo frequencies. All the features influence the system’s high-speed performance.

no data
Cores
64x
2 / 4
CPU Cores / Threads
64 / 128
no data
Core architecture
normal
Yes
Hyperthreading
Yes
No
Overclocking
No
3.90 GHz
Frequency
2.00 GHz
No turbo
Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
3.35 GHz
No turbo
Turbo Frequency (2 Cores)
no data
no data
Turbo Frequency (64 Cores)
2.50 GHz

Intel Pentium Gold G5600 vs. AMD Epyc 7702
CPU generation and family

2
CPU Cores
64
ca. 60 $
Market price
ca. 8000 $
no data
Name
AMD Epyc 7702
no data
Family
AMD Epyc
no data
CPU group
AMD Epyc 7002
9.5
Generation
no data
Segment
Desktop / Server
no data
Predecessor
--
no data
Successor
--

Intel Pentium Gold G5600 vs. AMD Epyc 7702
Internal Graphics

Some manufacturers build a graphic core in many CPUs being an additional advantage. If you use a video card which is separated from a CPU, we recommend you skip this comparison as there is no need to compare Intel Pentium Gold G5600 to AMD Epyc 7702 across a built-in video card.

Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU name
0.35 GHz
GPU frequency
1.10 GHz
GPU (Turbo)
No turbo
24
Execution units
192
Shader
no data
Max. GPU Memory
--
3
Max. displays
9.5
Generation
12
Direct X
--
14 nm
Technology
Q4/2017
Release date

Intel Pentium Gold G5600 vs. AMD Epyc 7702
Hardware codec support

Pay attention to support of different technological options by CPUs. The general performance is not influenced. In the interest of time, you can skip this section.

Decode / Encode
h265 8bit
No
Decode / Encode
h265 10bit
No
no data
h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
No
no data
h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
No
Decode / Encode
h264
No
Decode / Encode
VP8
No
Decode / Encode
VP9
No
no data
AV1
No
Decode / Encode
AVC
No
Decode
VC-1
No
Decode / Encode
JPEG
No

Intel Pentium Gold G5600 vs. AMD Epyc 7702
Memory & PCIe

Modern CPUs support memory which operates in a multi-channel regime that provides high-speed data exchange and improves productivity. The higher the ram’s clock frequency, its standard (for example, DDR3, DDR4, DDR5) and maximum space in a system are, the better it is.

3.0
PCIe version
4.0
16
PCIe lanes
128
DDR4-2400
Memory type
DDR4-3200
2
Memory channels
8
no data
Bandwidth
--
Yes
ECC
Yes
no data
PCIe
4.0 x 128
Yes
AES-NI
Yes

Intel Pentium Gold G5600 vs. AMD Epyc 7702
Thermal Management

High-performance and powerful CPUs require the essence of a good power supply. Here you learn how much TDP Intel Pentium Gold G5600 and AMD Epyc 7702 have. We recommend paying attention to the model which has lower TDP.

54 W
TDP
200 W
no data
TDP (PL1)
200 W
no data
TDP (PL2)
--
--
TDP up
--
--
TDP down
--
--
Tjunction max.
--

Intel Pentium Gold G5600 vs. AMD Epyc 7702
Technical details

Here is the main information which can define the best CPU comparing technical specifications. Thus, the higher cash L2 and L3, the better it is. The lower the technological process of CPU production, the better it is. Another important factor is a production year that directly influences the manufacturer’s support terms and the opportunity of a system modernization at minimal cost in the future.

no data
Instruction set (ISA)
x86-64 (64 bit)
no data
ISA extensions
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
no data
L2-Cache
--
4.00 MB
L3-Cache
256.00 MB
Coffee Lake
Architecture
Rome (Zen 2)
14 nm
Technology
7 nm
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Virtualization
AMD-V, SEV
LGA 1151
Socket
SP3
Q2/2018
Release date
Q3/2019
no data
Part Number
--

Intel Pentium Gold G5600 vs. AMD Epyc 7702
Devices using this processor

In completing the comparison between Intel Pentium Gold G5600 and AMD Epyc 7702, you can learn in which computer systems these models are used.

Unknown
Used in
Unknown

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

The version, having become a gold standard of a synthetic benchmark, allows accurately define a CPU performance in Cinema 4 Suite software complex. The most points mean a model’s best efficiency. Hyperthreading is not included.

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

It is a testing performance standard of CPU by Maxon. It is a specialized multi-platform number of tests that estimate the power of all processor cores in rendering mode.

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

The updated version of the Cinebench R23 benchmark shows an accurate performance assessment given all modern standards and apps requirements. It works in a loading mode of all cores and threads.

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is Maxon’s actual benchmark for older processors versions that test the processor’s performance without hyperthreading in single-core mode.

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 benchmark reflects the efficiency of your processor operation in assessment mode. It works on Cinema 4 Suite software complex of the earlier version. Hyperthreading is not included.

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

A benchmark is designed to determine graphics cards’ performance and speed, built into their central processor. It works in iGPU mode, FP32 Performance. The higher the rate is, the better it is.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

A modern version of the GeekBench 5 benchmark reveals all opportunities and potential of your processor. As a result of testing, you can understand to what extent a processor is fast and efficient in operation with graphic apps or games.

Blender 2.81 (bmw27)

Universal benchmark Blender 2.81 (bmw27) starts processor testing in rendering animated 3D images. The faster the processor copes with the task, the higher the overall performance estimation is.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

To define how efficient and powerful a processor is among several models or in comparison with another, we recommend paying attention to Geekbench 3 benchmark, which tests the single-core processor performance.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

To reveal the whole potential of the equipment, the Geekbench 3 benchmark uses all cores for 64bit models in a specialised software complex that imitates modelling various 3D scenarios. The higher estimation is, the better the performance is.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench R11.5 is an outdated version of the benchmark for processors of earlier generations. To find out the potential or compare it with a modern processor model, it is enough to check the performance estimate. The higher it is, the better it is. Hyperthreading is not included.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R11.5 benchmark is designed for testing early-generation processors. The overall final performance is based on 3D scene simulations in Cinema 4 Suite. It engages all processor cores.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)

A classic benchmark is designed for testing the built-in graphics processor that works in the OpenGL standard.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

The authoritative benchmark PassMark shows how efficient the processor is in the overall performance rating. It takes into account the operation mode of all cores and supports hyperthreading. The benchmark is based on various scenarios for performing calculations, 2D and 3D modelling.

Monero Hashrate kH/s

The possibility of the cryptocurrency Monero mining is being tested using a processor. Scenarios have been performed in OS Hive and boosted by XMRig v6.x.