Comparing technical specs and benchmarks

Intel Core i5-4690S
VS
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v6

Intel Core i5-4690S 22 nm - 3.20 GHz DDR3-1600 

Intel Xeon E3-1220 v6  - 3.00 GHz DDR4-2400 

VS

Intel Core i5-4690S vs. Intel Xeon E3-1220 v6
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In comparison between Intel Core i5-4690S and Intel Xeon E3-1220 v6, you should choose the model which has more cores and threads with base and turbo frequencies. All the features influence the system’s high-speed performance.

4 / 4
CPU Cores / Threads
4 / 4
No
Hyperthreading
No
No
Overclocking
No
3.20 GHz
Frequency
3.00 GHz
3.90 GHz
Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
3.50 GHz
3.50 GHz
Turbo Frequency (4 Cores)
3.30 GHz

Intel Core i5-4690S vs. Intel Xeon E3-1220 v6
CPU generation and family

4
CPU Cores
4
ca. 200 $
Market price
7.5
Generation

Intel Core i5-4690S vs. Intel Xeon E3-1220 v6
Internal Graphics

Some manufacturers build a graphic core in many CPUs being an additional advantage. If you use a video card which is separated from a CPU, we recommend you skip this comparison as there is no need to compare Intel Core i5-4690S to Intel Xeon E3-1220 v6 across a built-in video card.

Intel HD Graphics 4600
GPU name
0.35 GHz
GPU frequency
1.20 GHz
GPU (Turbo)
No turbo
20
Execution units
160
Shader
3
Max. displays
7.5
Generation
11.1
Direct X
22 nm
Technology
Q2/2013
Release date

Intel Core i5-4690S vs. Intel Xeon E3-1220 v6
Hardware codec support

Pay attention to support of different technological options by CPUs. The general performance is not influenced. In the interest of time, you can skip this section.

No
h265 8bit
No
No
h265 10bit
No
Decode / Encode
h264
No
No
VP8
No
No
VP9
No
Decode / Encode
AVC
No
Decode
VC-1
No
Decode
JPEG
No

Intel Core i5-4690S vs. Intel Xeon E3-1220 v6
Memory & PCIe

Modern CPUs support memory which operates in a multi-channel regime that provides high-speed data exchange and improves productivity. The higher the ram’s clock frequency, its standard (for example, DDR3, DDR4, DDR5) and maximum space in a system are, the better it is.

3.0
PCIe version
3.0
16
PCIe lanes
16
DDR3-1600
Memory type
DDR4-2400
2
Memory channels
2
No
ECC
Yes
Yes
AES-NI
Yes

Intel Core i5-4690S vs. Intel Xeon E3-1220 v6
Thermal Management

High-performance and powerful CPUs require the essence of a good power supply. Here you learn how much TDP Intel Core i5-4690S and Intel Xeon E3-1220 v6 have. We recommend paying attention to the model which has lower TDP.

84 W
TDP
72 W
--
TDP up
--
--
TDP down
--
--
Tjunction max.
--

Intel Core i5-4690S vs. Intel Xeon E3-1220 v6
Technical details

Here is the main information which can define the best CPU comparing technical specifications. Thus, the higher cash L2 and L3, the better it is. The lower the technological process of CPU production, the better it is. Another important factor is a production year that directly influences the manufacturer’s support terms and the opportunity of a system modernization at minimal cost in the future.

6.00 MB
L3-Cache
8.00 MB
Haswell Refresh
Architecture
Kaby-Lake
22 nm
Technology
14 nm
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
LGA 1150
Socket
LGA 1151
Q2/2014
Release date
Q1/2017

Intel Core i5-4690S vs. Intel Xeon E3-1220 v6
Devices using this processor

In completing the comparison between Intel Core i5-4690S and Intel Xeon E3-1220 v6, you can learn in which computer systems these models are used.

Unknown
Used in
Unknown

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is Maxon’s actual benchmark for older processors versions that test the processor’s performance without hyperthreading in single-core mode.

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 benchmark reflects the efficiency of your processor operation in assessment mode. It works on Cinema 4 Suite software complex of the earlier version. Hyperthreading is not included.

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

A benchmark is designed to determine graphics cards’ performance and speed, built into their central processor. It works in iGPU mode, FP32 Performance. The higher the rate is, the better it is.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

A new approach to testing processor performance opens up the GeekBench 5 benchmark! A detailed under-load system analysis gives an accurate assessment of the quality. The higher the estimation is, the faster and more efficient the processor is. It is a version for testing a single core.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

A modern version of the GeekBench 5 benchmark reveals all opportunities and potential of your processor. As a result of testing, you can understand to what extent a processor is fast and efficient in operation with graphic apps or games.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

To define how efficient and powerful a processor is among several models or in comparison with another, we recommend paying attention to Geekbench 3 benchmark, which tests the single-core processor performance.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

To reveal the whole potential of the equipment, the Geekbench 3 benchmark uses all cores for 64bit models in a specialised software complex that imitates modelling various 3D scenarios. The higher estimation is, the better the performance is.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench R11.5 is an outdated version of the benchmark for processors of earlier generations. To find out the potential or compare it with a modern processor model, it is enough to check the performance estimate. The higher it is, the better it is. Hyperthreading is not included.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R11.5 benchmark is designed for testing early-generation processors. The overall final performance is based on 3D scene simulations in Cinema 4 Suite. It engages all processor cores.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)

A classic benchmark is designed for testing the built-in graphics processor that works in the OpenGL standard.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

The authoritative benchmark PassMark shows how efficient the processor is in the overall performance rating. It takes into account the operation mode of all cores and supports hyperthreading. The benchmark is based on various scenarios for performing calculations, 2D and 3D modelling.