Intel Celeron G3930T vs AMD Phenom II X3 710

Comparing technical specs and benchmarks

Intel Celeron G3930T
VS
AMD Phenom II X3 710
VS

Which to choose?

By comparing technical characteristics, you can easily take the best CPU. The most important specifications are highlighted green which influences the total CPU performance while working or playing games. It is time to compare Intel Celeron G3930T to AMD Phenom II X3 710 and find out the difference between them.

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In comparison between Intel Celeron G3930T and AMD Phenom II X3 710, you should choose the model which has more cores and threads with base and turbo frequencies. All the features influence the system’s high-speed performance.

2.70 GHz
Frequency
2.60 GHz
2
CPU Cores
3
No turbo
Turbo (1 Core)
No turbo
2
CPU Threads
3
No turbo
Turbo (2 Cores)
no data
No
Hyperthreading
No
No
Overclocking
Yes
no data
Turbo (3 Cores)
No turbo

Internal Graphics

Some manufacturers build a graphic core in many CPUs being an additional advantage. If you use a video card which is separated from a CPU, we recommend you skip this comparison as there is no need to compare Intel Celeron G3930T to AMD Phenom II X3 710 across a built-in video card.

Intel HD Graphics 610
GPU name
0.35 GHz
GPU frequency
1.00 GHz
GPU (Turbo)
No turbo
9.5
Generation
12
DirectX Version
12
Execution units
96
Shader
32 GB
Max. Memory
--
3
Max. displays
14 nm
Technology
Q3/2016
Release date

Hardware codec support

Pay attention to support of different technological options by CPUs. The general performance is not influenced. In the interest of time, you can skip this section.

Decode / Encode
h264
No
Decode / Encode
JPEG
No
Decode / Encode
h265 8bit
No
Decode / Encode
h265 10bit
No
Decode / Encode
VP8
No
Decode / Encode
VP9
No
Decode
VC-1
No
Decode / Encode
AVC
No

RAM and PCIe

Modern CPUs support memory which operates in a multi-channel regime that provides high-speed data exchange and improves productivity. The higher the ram’s clock frequency, its standard (for example, DDR3, DDR4, DDR5) and maximum space in a system are, the better it is.

DDR4-2400
Memory type
DDR2-1066
2
Memory channels
2
Yes
ECC
No
3.0
PCIe version
16
PCIe lanes

Encryption

Learn if a CPU supports encryption data operation.

Yes
AES-NI
No

Thermal Management

High-performance and powerful CPUs require the essence of a good power supply. Here you learn how much TDP Intel Celeron G3930T and AMD Phenom II X3 710 have. We recommend paying attention to the model which has lower TDP.

35 W
TDP
95 W
--
Tjunction max.
--
--
TDP up
--
--
TDP down
--

Technical details

Here is the main information which can define the best CPU comparing technical specifications. Thus, the higher cash L2 and L3, the better it is. The lower the technological process of CPU production, the better it is. Another important factor is a production year that directly influences the manufacturer’s support terms and the opportunity of a system modernization at minimal cost in the future.

2.00 MB
L3-Cache
6.00 MB
14 nm
Technology
45nm
Kaby Lake
Architecture
Heka
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Virtualization
AMD-V, AMD-RVI
LGA 1151
Socket
AM3
Q1/2017
Release date
Q1/2009
ca. 40 $
Market price

Devices using this processor

In completing the comparison between Intel Celeron G3930T and AMD Phenom II X3 710, you can learn in which computer systems these models are used.

Unknown
Used in
Unknown

CPU generation and family

Boss

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is Maxon’s actual benchmark for older processors versions that test the processor’s performance without hyperthreading in single-core mode.

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 benchmark reflects the efficiency of your processor operation in assessment mode. It works on Cinema 4 Suite software complex of the earlier version. Hyperthreading is not included.

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

A benchmark is designed to determine graphics cards’ performance and speed, built into their central processor. It works in iGPU mode, FP32 Performance. The higher the rate is, the better it is.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

A new approach to testing processor performance opens up the GeekBench 5 benchmark! A detailed under-load system analysis gives an accurate assessment of the quality. The higher the estimation is, the faster and more efficient the processor is. It is a version for testing a single core.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

A modern version of the GeekBench 5 benchmark reveals all opportunities and potential of your processor. As a result of testing, you can understand to what extent a processor is fast and efficient in operation with graphic apps or games.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

To define how efficient and powerful a processor is among several models or in comparison with another, we recommend paying attention to Geekbench 3 benchmark, which tests the single-core processor performance.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

To reveal the whole potential of the equipment, the Geekbench 3 benchmark uses all cores for 64bit models in a specialised software complex that imitates modelling various 3D scenarios. The higher estimation is, the better the performance is.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench R11.5 is an outdated version of the benchmark for processors of earlier generations. To find out the potential or compare it with a modern processor model, it is enough to check the performance estimate. The higher it is, the better it is. Hyperthreading is not included.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R11.5 benchmark is designed for testing early-generation processors. The overall final performance is based on 3D scene simulations in Cinema 4 Suite. It engages all processor cores.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)

A classic benchmark is designed for testing the built-in graphics processor that works in the OpenGL standard.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

The authoritative benchmark PassMark shows how efficient the processor is in the overall performance rating. It takes into account the operation mode of all cores and supports hyperthreading. The benchmark is based on various scenarios for performing calculations, 2D and 3D modelling.