Comparing technical specs and benchmarks

AMD Ryzen Embedded V1756B
VS
Intel Celeron J1800

AMD Ryzen Embedded V1756B 14 nm - 3.25 GHz DDR4-3200 

Intel Celeron J1800 22 nm - 2.41 GHz DDR3L-1333 SO-DIMM 

VS

AMD Ryzen Embedded V1756B vs. Intel Celeron J1800
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In comparison between AMD Ryzen Embedded V1756B and Intel Celeron J1800, you should choose the model which has more cores and threads with base and turbo frequencies. All the features influence the system’s high-speed performance.

4 / 8
CPU Cores / Threads
2 / 2
normal
Core architecture
no data
0x
A core
no data
0x
B core
no data
Yes
Hyperthreading
No
No
Overclocking
No
3.25 GHz
Frequency
2.41 GHz
3.60 GHz
Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
2.58 GHz
no data
Turbo Frequency (2 Cores)
2.58 GHz
3.25 GHz
Turbo Frequency (4 Cores)
no data

AMD Ryzen Embedded V1756B vs. Intel Celeron J1800
CPU generation and family

4
CPU Cores
2
Market price
ca. 47 $
8
Generation
7

AMD Ryzen Embedded V1756B vs. Intel Celeron J1800
Internal Graphics

Some manufacturers build a graphic core in many CPUs being an additional advantage. If you use a video card which is separated from a CPU, we recommend you skip this comparison as there is no need to compare AMD Ryzen Embedded V1756B to Intel Celeron J1800 across a built-in video card.

AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
GPU name
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)
1.10 GHz
GPU frequency
0.69 GHz
No turbo
GPU (Turbo)
0.79 GHz
8
Execution units
4
512
Shader
32
3
Max. displays
2
8
Generation
7
12
Direct X
11.2
14 nm
Technology
22 nm
Q1/2018
Release date
Q3/2013

AMD Ryzen Embedded V1756B vs. Intel Celeron J1800
Hardware codec support

Pay attention to support of different technological options by CPUs. The general performance is not influenced. In the interest of time, you can skip this section.

no data
h265 8bit
No
no data
h265 10bit
No
Decode / Encode
h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
no data
Decode / Encode
h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
no data
Decode / Encode
h264
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
VP8
No
Decode / Encode
VP9
No
No
AV1
no data
Decode / Encode
AVC
Decode / Encode
Decode
VC-1
Decode
Decode / Encode
JPEG
Decode

AMD Ryzen Embedded V1756B vs. Intel Celeron J1800
Memory & PCIe

Modern CPUs support memory which operates in a multi-channel regime that provides high-speed data exchange and improves productivity. The higher the ram’s clock frequency, its standard (for example, DDR3, DDR4, DDR5) and maximum space in a system are, the better it is.

3.0
PCIe version
2.0
16
PCIe lanes
4
DDR4-3200
Memory type
DDR3L-1333 SO-DIMM
32 GB
Max. Memory
2
Memory channels
2
Yes
ECC
No
Yes
AES-NI
No

AMD Ryzen Embedded V1756B vs. Intel Celeron J1800
Thermal Management

High-performance and powerful CPUs require the essence of a good power supply. Here you learn how much TDP AMD Ryzen Embedded V1756B and Intel Celeron J1800 have. We recommend paying attention to the model which has lower TDP.

no data
TDP
10 W
45 W
TDP (PL1)
no data
--
TDP (PL2)
no data
54 W
TDP up
--
35 W
TDP down
--
105 °C
Tjunction max.
--

AMD Ryzen Embedded V1756B vs. Intel Celeron J1800
Technical details

Here is the main information which can define the best CPU comparing technical specifications. Thus, the higher cash L2 and L3, the better it is. The lower the technological process of CPU production, the better it is. Another important factor is a production year that directly influences the manufacturer’s support terms and the opportunity of a system modernization at minimal cost in the future.

x86-64 (64 bit)
Instruction set (ISA)
no data
--
L2-Cache
no data
4.00 MB
L3-Cache
1.00 MB
Great Horned Owl (Zen)
Architecture
Bay Trail
14 nm
Technology
22 nm
AMD-V, SEV
Virtualization
VT-x
FP5
Socket
BGA 1170
Q1/2018
Release date
Q4/2013

AMD Ryzen Embedded V1756B vs. Intel Celeron J1800
Devices using this processor

In completing the comparison between AMD Ryzen Embedded V1756B and Intel Celeron J1800, you can learn in which computer systems these models are used.

Unknown
Used in
Unknown

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is Maxon’s actual benchmark for older processors versions that test the processor’s performance without hyperthreading in single-core mode.

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 benchmark reflects the efficiency of your processor operation in assessment mode. It works on Cinema 4 Suite software complex of the earlier version. Hyperthreading is not included.

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

A benchmark is designed to determine graphics cards’ performance and speed, built into their central processor. It works in iGPU mode, FP32 Performance. The higher the rate is, the better it is.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

To define how efficient and powerful a processor is among several models or in comparison with another, we recommend paying attention to Geekbench 3 benchmark, which tests the single-core processor performance.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

To reveal the whole potential of the equipment, the Geekbench 3 benchmark uses all cores for 64bit models in a specialised software complex that imitates modelling various 3D scenarios. The higher estimation is, the better the performance is.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench R11.5 is an outdated version of the benchmark for processors of earlier generations. To find out the potential or compare it with a modern processor model, it is enough to check the performance estimate. The higher it is, the better it is. Hyperthreading is not included.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R11.5 benchmark is designed for testing early-generation processors. The overall final performance is based on 3D scene simulations in Cinema 4 Suite. It engages all processor cores.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

The authoritative benchmark PassMark shows how efficient the processor is in the overall performance rating. It takes into account the operation mode of all cores and supports hyperthreading. The benchmark is based on various scenarios for performing calculations, 2D and 3D modelling.