Comparing technical specs and benchmarks

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
VS
Intel Celeron 2980U

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X  - 3.70 GHz DDR4-2933 

Intel Celeron 2980U 22 nm - 1.40 GHz DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM 

VS

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs. Intel Celeron 2980U
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In comparison between AMD Ryzen 7 2700X and Intel Celeron 2980U, you should choose the model which has more cores and threads with base and turbo frequencies. All the features influence the system’s high-speed performance.

8 / 16
CPU Cores / Threads
2 / 2
Yes
Hyperthreading
No
Yes
Overclocking
No
3.70 GHz
Frequency
1.40 GHz
Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
No turbo
Turbo Frequency (2 Cores)
No turbo
3.85 GHz
Turbo Frequency (8 Cores)
no data

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs. Intel Celeron 2980U
CPU generation and family

8
CPU Cores
2
ca. 320 $
Market price
Generation
7.5

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs. Intel Celeron 2980U
Internal Graphics

Some manufacturers build a graphic core in many CPUs being an additional advantage. If you use a video card which is separated from a CPU, we recommend you skip this comparison as there is no need to compare AMD Ryzen 7 2700X to Intel Celeron 2980U across a built-in video card.

GPU name
Intel HD Graphics (Haswell GT1)
GPU frequency
0.20 GHz
No turbo
GPU (Turbo)
1.00 GHz
Execution units
10
Shader
80
Max. displays
3
Generation
7.5
Direct X
11.1
Technology
22 nm
Release date
Q4/2012

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs. Intel Celeron 2980U
Hardware codec support

Pay attention to support of different technological options by CPUs. The general performance is not influenced. In the interest of time, you can skip this section.

No
h265 8bit
No
No
h265 10bit
No
No
h264
Decode / Encode
No
VP8
No
No
VP9
No
No
AVC
Decode / Encode
No
VC-1
Decode
No
JPEG
Decode

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs. Intel Celeron 2980U
Memory & PCIe

Modern CPUs support memory which operates in a multi-channel regime that provides high-speed data exchange and improves productivity. The higher the ram’s clock frequency, its standard (for example, DDR3, DDR4, DDR5) and maximum space in a system are, the better it is.

3.0
PCIe version
2.0
20
PCIe lanes
12
DDR4-2933
Memory type
DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM
64 GB
Max. Memory
2
Memory channels
2
Yes
ECC
No
Yes
AES-NI
No

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs. Intel Celeron 2980U
Thermal Management

High-performance and powerful CPUs require the essence of a good power supply. Here you learn how much TDP AMD Ryzen 7 2700X and Intel Celeron 2980U have. We recommend paying attention to the model which has lower TDP.

105 W
TDP
15 W
--
TDP up
--
--
TDP down
--
95 °C
Tjunction max.
--

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs. Intel Celeron 2980U
Technical details

Here is the main information which can define the best CPU comparing technical specifications. Thus, the higher cash L2 and L3, the better it is. The lower the technological process of CPU production, the better it is. Another important factor is a production year that directly influences the manufacturer’s support terms and the opportunity of a system modernization at minimal cost in the future.

AMD64
Instruction set (ISA)
no data
4.00 MB
L2-Cache
no data
16.00 MB
L3-Cache
2.00 MB
Zen+ (Pinnacle Ridge)
Architecture
Haswell
12 nm
Technology
22 nm
AMD-V, SEV
Virtualization
VT-x
AM4
Socket
BGA 1168
Q2/2018
Release date
Q3/2013
YD270XBGAFBOX
Part Number
no data

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs. Intel Celeron 2980U
Devices using this processor

In completing the comparison between AMD Ryzen 7 2700X and Intel Celeron 2980U, you can learn in which computer systems these models are used.

Gaming PC
Used in
Unknown

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

The version, having become a gold standard of a synthetic benchmark, allows accurately define a CPU performance in Cinema 4 Suite software complex. The most points mean a model’s best efficiency. Hyperthreading is not included.

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

It is a testing performance standard of CPU by Maxon. It is a specialized multi-platform number of tests that estimate the power of all processor cores in rendering mode.

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

The updated version of the Cinebench R23 benchmark shows an accurate performance assessment given all modern standards and apps requirements. It works in a loading mode of all cores and threads.

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is Maxon’s actual benchmark for older processors versions that test the processor’s performance without hyperthreading in single-core mode.

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 benchmark reflects the efficiency of your processor operation in assessment mode. It works on Cinema 4 Suite software complex of the earlier version. Hyperthreading is not included.

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

A benchmark is designed to determine graphics cards’ performance and speed, built into their central processor. It works in iGPU mode, FP32 Performance. The higher the rate is, the better it is.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

A new approach to testing processor performance opens up the GeekBench 5 benchmark! A detailed under-load system analysis gives an accurate assessment of the quality. The higher the estimation is, the faster and more efficient the processor is. It is a version for testing a single core.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

A modern version of the GeekBench 5 benchmark reveals all opportunities and potential of your processor. As a result of testing, you can understand to what extent a processor is fast and efficient in operation with graphic apps or games.

Blender 2.81 (bmw27)

Universal benchmark Blender 2.81 (bmw27) starts processor testing in rendering animated 3D images. The faster the processor copes with the task, the higher the overall performance estimation is.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

To define how efficient and powerful a processor is among several models or in comparison with another, we recommend paying attention to Geekbench 3 benchmark, which tests the single-core processor performance.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

To reveal the whole potential of the equipment, the Geekbench 3 benchmark uses all cores for 64bit models in a specialised software complex that imitates modelling various 3D scenarios. The higher estimation is, the better the performance is.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench R11.5 is an outdated version of the benchmark for processors of earlier generations. To find out the potential or compare it with a modern processor model, it is enough to check the performance estimate. The higher it is, the better it is. Hyperthreading is not included.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R11.5 benchmark is designed for testing early-generation processors. The overall final performance is based on 3D scene simulations in Cinema 4 Suite. It engages all processor cores.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)

A classic benchmark is designed for testing the built-in graphics processor that works in the OpenGL standard.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

The authoritative benchmark PassMark shows how efficient the processor is in the overall performance rating. It takes into account the operation mode of all cores and supports hyperthreading. The benchmark is based on various scenarios for performing calculations, 2D and 3D modelling.

Monero Hashrate kH/s

The possibility of the cryptocurrency Monero mining is being tested using a processor. Scenarios have been performed in OS Hive and boosted by XMRig v6.x.