AMD Phenom II X4 B97 vs Intel Core i9-10900KF

Comparing technical specs and benchmarks

AMD Phenom II X4 B97
VS
Intel Core i9-10900KF
VS

Which to choose?

By comparing technical characteristics, you can easily take the best CPU. The most important specifications are highlighted green which influences the total CPU performance while working or playing games. It is time to compare AMD Phenom II X4 B97 to Intel Core i9-10900KF and find out the difference between them.

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In comparison between AMD Phenom II X4 B97 and Intel Core i9-10900KF, you should choose the model which has more cores and threads with base and turbo frequencies. All the features influence the system’s high-speed performance.

3.20 GHz
Frequency
3.70 GHz
4
CPU Cores
10
No turbo
Turbo (1 Core)
5.30 GHz
4
CPU Threads
20
No
Hyperthreading
Yes
Yes
Overclocking
Yes
No turbo
Turbo (4 Cores)
no data
Turbo (10 Cores)
4.90 GHz

Internal Graphics

Some manufacturers build a graphic core in many CPUs being an additional advantage. If you use a video card which is separated from a CPU, we recommend you skip this comparison as there is no need to compare AMD Phenom II X4 B97 to Intel Core i9-10900KF across a built-in video card.

No turbo
GPU (Turbo)
No turbo
--
Max. Memory

Hardware codec support

Pay attention to support of different technological options by CPUs. The general performance is not influenced. In the interest of time, you can skip this section.

No
h264
No
No
JPEG
No
No
h265 8bit
No
No
h265 10bit
No
No
VP8
No
No
VP9
No
No
VC-1
No
No
AVC
No

RAM and PCIe

Modern CPUs support memory which operates in a multi-channel regime that provides high-speed data exchange and improves productivity. The higher the ram’s clock frequency, its standard (for example, DDR3, DDR4, DDR5) and maximum space in a system are, the better it is.

DDR2-1066
Memory type
DDR4-2933
Max. Memory
128 GB
2
Memory channels
2
No
ECC
No
PCIe version
3.0
PCIe lanes
16

Encryption

Learn if a CPU supports encryption data operation.

No
AES-NI
Yes

Thermal Management

High-performance and powerful CPUs require the essence of a good power supply. Here you learn how much TDP AMD Phenom II X4 B97 and Intel Core i9-10900KF have. We recommend paying attention to the model which has lower TDP.

95 W
TDP
125 W
--
Tjunction max.
100 °C
--
TDP up
--
--
TDP down
95 W

Technical details

Here is the main information which can define the best CPU comparing technical specifications. Thus, the higher cash L2 and L3, the better it is. The lower the technological process of CPU production, the better it is. Another important factor is a production year that directly influences the manufacturer’s support terms and the opportunity of a system modernization at minimal cost in the future.

6.00 MB
L3-Cache
20.00 MB
45nm
Technology
14 nm
Deneb
Architecture
Comet Lake
AMD-V, AMD-RVI
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
AM3
Socket
LGA 1200
Q2/2010
Release date
Q2/2020
Market price
ca. 474 $
no data
Instruction set (ISA)
64-bit
no data
L2-Cache
2.56 MB

Devices using this processor

In completing the comparison between AMD Phenom II X4 B97 and Intel Core i9-10900KF, you can learn in which computer systems these models are used.

Unknown
Used in
PC/Client/Tablet

CPU generation and family

Boss

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

The version, having become a gold standard of a synthetic benchmark, allows accurately define a CPU performance in Cinema 4 Suite software complex. The most points mean a model’s best efficiency. Hyperthreading is not included.

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

It is the most actual version of the Cinebench R23 benchmark for testing processors in the single-core using mode. Like all the company’s versions, it uses a brand app for testing.

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

It is a testing performance standard of CPU by Maxon. It is a specialized multi-platform number of tests that estimate the power of all processor cores in rendering mode.

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

The updated version of the Cinebench R23 benchmark shows an accurate performance assessment given all modern standards and apps requirements. It works in a loading mode of all cores and threads.

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is Maxon’s actual benchmark for older processors versions that test the processor’s performance without hyperthreading in single-core mode.

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 benchmark reflects the efficiency of your processor operation in assessment mode. It works on Cinema 4 Suite software complex of the earlier version. Hyperthreading is not included.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

A new approach to testing processor performance opens up the GeekBench 5 benchmark! A detailed under-load system analysis gives an accurate assessment of the quality. The higher the estimation is, the faster and more efficient the processor is. It is a version for testing a single core.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

A modern version of the GeekBench 5 benchmark reveals all opportunities and potential of your processor. As a result of testing, you can understand to what extent a processor is fast and efficient in operation with graphic apps or games.

Blender 2.81 (bmw27)

Universal benchmark Blender 2.81 (bmw27) starts processor testing in rendering animated 3D images. The faster the processor copes with the task, the higher the overall performance estimation is.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

To define how efficient and powerful a processor is among several models or in comparison with another, we recommend paying attention to Geekbench 3 benchmark, which tests the single-core processor performance.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

To reveal the whole potential of the equipment, the Geekbench 3 benchmark uses all cores for 64bit models in a specialised software complex that imitates modelling various 3D scenarios. The higher estimation is, the better the performance is.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench R11.5 is an outdated version of the benchmark for processors of earlier generations. To find out the potential or compare it with a modern processor model, it is enough to check the performance estimate. The higher it is, the better it is. Hyperthreading is not included.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R11.5 benchmark is designed for testing early-generation processors. The overall final performance is based on 3D scene simulations in Cinema 4 Suite. It engages all processor cores.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

The authoritative benchmark PassMark shows how efficient the processor is in the overall performance rating. It takes into account the operation mode of all cores and supports hyperthreading. The benchmark is based on various scenarios for performing calculations, 2D and 3D modelling.

Monero Hashrate kH/s

The possibility of the cryptocurrency Monero mining is being tested using a processor. Scenarios have been performed in OS Hive and boosted by XMRig v6.x.