Comparing technical specs and benchmarks

AMD Phenom II X4 980
VS
AMD A8-7650K

The processor AMD Phenom II X4 980 is developed on the technology node and architecture Deneb. Its base clock speed is 3.70 GHz, and maximum clock speed in turbo boost No turbo. The processor contains 4 processing cores supported DDR2-1066 memory. To make a right choice for processor upgrading, please get familiar with the detailed technical specifications and benchmark testing results. 

The processor AMD A8-7650K is developed on the 28 nm technology node and architecture Kaveri. Its base clock speed is 3.30 GHz, and maximum clock speed in turbo boost 3.80 GHz. The processor contains 4 processing cores supported DDR3-2133 memory. To make a right choice for processor upgrading, please get familiar with the detailed technical specifications and benchmark testing results. 

VS

Which to choose?

By comparing technical characteristics, you can easily take the best CPU. The most important specifications are highlighted green which influences the total CPU performance while working or playing games. It is time to compare AMD Phenom II X4 980 to AMD A8-7650K and find out the difference between them.

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In comparison between AMD Phenom II X4 980 and AMD A8-7650K, you should choose the model which has more cores and threads with base and turbo frequencies. All the features influence the system’s high-speed performance.

3.70 GHz
Frequency
3.30 GHz
4
CPU Cores
4
No turbo
Turbo (1 Core)
3.80 GHz
4
CPU Threads
4
No
Hyperthreading
No
Yes
Overclocking
Yes
No turbo
Turbo (4 Cores)
3.80 GHz

Internal Graphics

Some manufacturers build a graphic core in many CPUs being an additional advantage. If you use a video card which is separated from a CPU, we recommend you skip this comparison as there is no need to compare AMD Phenom II X4 980 to AMD A8-7650K across a built-in video card.

GPU name
AMD Radeon R7 - 384 (Kaveri)
GPU frequency
0.72 GHz
No turbo
GPU (Turbo)
No turbo
Generation
6
DirectX Version
12
Execution units
6
Shader
384
--
Max. Memory
2 GB
Max. displays
2
Technology
28 nm
Release date
Q1/2015

Hardware codec support

Pay attention to support of different technological options by CPUs. The general performance is not influenced. In the interest of time, you can skip this section.

No
h264
Decode
No
JPEG
Decode / Encode
No
h265 8bit
No
No
h265 10bit
No
No
VP8
No
No
VP9
No
No
VC-1
Decode
No
AVC
Decode

RAM and PCIe

Modern CPUs support memory which operates in a multi-channel regime that provides high-speed data exchange and improves productivity. The higher the ram’s clock frequency, its standard (for example, DDR3, DDR4, DDR5) and maximum space in a system are, the better it is.

DDR2-1066
Memory type
DDR3-2133
2
Memory channels
2
No
ECC
Yes
PCIe version
3.0
PCIe lanes
16

Encryption

Learn if a CPU supports encryption data operation.

No
AES-NI
Yes

Thermal Management

High-performance and powerful CPUs require the essence of a good power supply. Here you learn how much TDP AMD Phenom II X4 980 and AMD A8-7650K have. We recommend paying attention to the model which has lower TDP.

125 W
TDP
95 W
--
Tjunction max.
--
--
TDP up
--
--
TDP down
--

Technical details

Here is the main information which can define the best CPU comparing technical specifications. Thus, the higher cash L2 and L3, the better it is. The lower the technological process of CPU production, the better it is. Another important factor is a production year that directly influences the manufacturer’s support terms and the opportunity of a system modernization at minimal cost in the future.

6.00 MB
L3-Cache
4.00 MB
45nm
Technology
28nm
Deneb
Architecture
Kaveri
AMD-V, AMD-RVI
Virtualization
AMD-V
AM3
Socket
FM2+
Q2/2011
Release date
Q1/2014
Market price
ca. 95 $

Devices using this processor

In completing the comparison between AMD Phenom II X4 980 and AMD A8-7650K, you can learn in which computer systems these models are used.

Unknown
Used in
Unknown

CPU generation and family

Boss

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is Maxon’s actual benchmark for older processors versions that test the processor’s performance without hyperthreading in single-core mode.

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 benchmark reflects the efficiency of your processor operation in assessment mode. It works on Cinema 4 Suite software complex of the earlier version. Hyperthreading is not included.

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

A benchmark is designed to determine graphics cards’ performance and speed, built into their central processor. It works in iGPU mode, FP32 Performance. The higher the rate is, the better it is.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

A new approach to testing processor performance opens up the GeekBench 5 benchmark! A detailed under-load system analysis gives an accurate assessment of the quality. The higher the estimation is, the faster and more efficient the processor is. It is a version for testing a single core.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

A modern version of the GeekBench 5 benchmark reveals all opportunities and potential of your processor. As a result of testing, you can understand to what extent a processor is fast and efficient in operation with graphic apps or games.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

To define how efficient and powerful a processor is among several models or in comparison with another, we recommend paying attention to Geekbench 3 benchmark, which tests the single-core processor performance.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

To reveal the whole potential of the equipment, the Geekbench 3 benchmark uses all cores for 64bit models in a specialised software complex that imitates modelling various 3D scenarios. The higher estimation is, the better the performance is.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench R11.5 is an outdated version of the benchmark for processors of earlier generations. To find out the potential or compare it with a modern processor model, it is enough to check the performance estimate. The higher it is, the better it is. Hyperthreading is not included.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R11.5 benchmark is designed for testing early-generation processors. The overall final performance is based on 3D scene simulations in Cinema 4 Suite. It engages all processor cores.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

The authoritative benchmark PassMark shows how efficient the processor is in the overall performance rating. It takes into account the operation mode of all cores and supports hyperthreading. The benchmark is based on various scenarios for performing calculations, 2D and 3D modelling.