Comparing technical specs and benchmarks

AMD FX-4350
VS
AMD A8-5545M

AMD FX-4350  - 4.20 GHz DDR3-1866 

AMD A8-5545M 32 nm - 1.70 GHz DDR3-1333 

VS

AMD FX-4350 vs. AMD A8-5545M
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In comparison between AMD FX-4350 and AMD A8-5545M, you should choose the model which has more cores and threads with base and turbo frequencies. All the features influence the system’s high-speed performance.

4x
Cores
4x
4 / 4
CPU Cores / Threads
4 / 4
normal
Core architecture
normal
No
Hyperthreading
No
Yes
Overclocking
No
4.20 GHz
Frequency
1.70 GHz
4.30 GHz
Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
2.70 GHz
4.30 GHz
Turbo Frequency (4 Cores)
2.70 GHz

AMD FX-4350 vs. AMD A8-5545M
CPU generation and family

4
CPU Cores
4
ca. 100 $
Market price
AMD FX-4350
Name
AMD A8-5545M
AMD FX
Family
AMD A
AMD FX-4300
CPU group
AMD A8-5000M
Generation
5
Desktop / Server
Segment
Mobile
--
Predecessor
--
--
Successor
--

AMD FX-4350 vs. AMD A8-5545M
Internal Graphics

Some manufacturers build a graphic core in many CPUs being an additional advantage. If you use a video card which is separated from a CPU, we recommend you skip this comparison as there is no need to compare AMD FX-4350 to AMD A8-5545M across a built-in video card.

GPU name
AMD Radeon HD 8510G
GPU frequency
0.45 GHz
No turbo
GPU (Turbo)
0.55 GHz
Execution units
6
Shader
384
--
Max. GPU Memory
2 GB
Max. displays
2
Generation
5
--
Direct X
11
Technology
32 nm
Release date
Q2/2013

AMD FX-4350 vs. AMD A8-5545M
Hardware codec support

Pay attention to support of different technological options by CPUs. The general performance is not influenced. In the interest of time, you can skip this section.

No
h265 8bit
No
No
h265 10bit
No
No
h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
No
No
h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
No
No
h264
Decode
No
VP8
No
No
VP9
No
No
AV1
No
No
AVC
Decode
No
VC-1
Decode
No
JPEG
Decode / Encode

AMD FX-4350 vs. AMD A8-5545M
Memory & PCIe

Modern CPUs support memory which operates in a multi-channel regime that provides high-speed data exchange and improves productivity. The higher the ram’s clock frequency, its standard (for example, DDR3, DDR4, DDR5) and maximum space in a system are, the better it is.

DDR3-1866
Memory type
DDR3-1333
2
Memory channels
2
--
Bandwidth
--
Yes
ECC
No
Yes
AES-NI
Yes

AMD FX-4350 vs. AMD A8-5545M
Thermal Management

High-performance and powerful CPUs require the essence of a good power supply. Here you learn how much TDP AMD FX-4350 and AMD A8-5545M have. We recommend paying attention to the model which has lower TDP.

125 W
TDP
19 W
125 W
TDP (PL1)
19 W
--
TDP (PL2)
--
--
TDP up
--
--
TDP down
--
--
Tjunction max.
--

AMD FX-4350 vs. AMD A8-5545M
Technical details

Here is the main information which can define the best CPU comparing technical specifications. Thus, the higher cash L2 and L3, the better it is. The lower the technological process of CPU production, the better it is. Another important factor is a production year that directly influences the manufacturer’s support terms and the opportunity of a system modernization at minimal cost in the future.

x86-64 (64 bit)
Instruction set (ISA)
x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4
ISA extensions
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4
--
L2-Cache
--
8.00 MB
L3-Cache
4.00 MB
Vishera
Architecture
Richland
32 nm
Technology
32 nm
AMD-V
Virtualization
AMD-V
AM3+
Socket
FP2
Q2/2013
Release date
Q2/2013
--
Part Number
--

AMD FX-4350 vs. AMD A8-5545M
Devices using this processor

In completing the comparison between AMD FX-4350 and AMD A8-5545M, you can learn in which computer systems these models are used.

Unknown
Used in
Unknown

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

A benchmark is designed to determine graphics cards’ performance and speed, built into their central processor. It works in iGPU mode, FP32 Performance. The higher the rate is, the better it is.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

A new approach to testing processor performance opens up the GeekBench 5 benchmark! A detailed under-load system analysis gives an accurate assessment of the quality. The higher the estimation is, the faster and more efficient the processor is. It is a version for testing a single core.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

A modern version of the GeekBench 5 benchmark reveals all opportunities and potential of your processor. As a result of testing, you can understand to what extent a processor is fast and efficient in operation with graphic apps or games.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

To define how efficient and powerful a processor is among several models or in comparison with another, we recommend paying attention to Geekbench 3 benchmark, which tests the single-core processor performance.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

To reveal the whole potential of the equipment, the Geekbench 3 benchmark uses all cores for 64bit models in a specialised software complex that imitates modelling various 3D scenarios. The higher estimation is, the better the performance is.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench R11.5 is an outdated version of the benchmark for processors of earlier generations. To find out the potential or compare it with a modern processor model, it is enough to check the performance estimate. The higher it is, the better it is. Hyperthreading is not included.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R11.5 benchmark is designed for testing early-generation processors. The overall final performance is based on 3D scene simulations in Cinema 4 Suite. It engages all processor cores.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

The authoritative benchmark PassMark shows how efficient the processor is in the overall performance rating. It takes into account the operation mode of all cores and supports hyperthreading. The benchmark is based on various scenarios for performing calculations, 2D and 3D modelling.