Comparing technical specs and benchmarks

AMD Athlon 5150
VS
AMD A4-3320M

AMD Athlon 5150 28 nm - 1.60 GHz DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM 

AMD A4-3320M 32 nm - 2.00 GHz DDR3-1333 

VS

AMD Athlon 5150 vs. AMD A4-3320M
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In comparison between AMD Athlon 5150 and AMD A4-3320M, you should choose the model which has more cores and threads with base and turbo frequencies. All the features influence the system’s high-speed performance.

4x
Cores
2x
4 / 4
CPU Cores / Threads
2 / 2
normal
Core architecture
normal
No
Hyperthreading
No
Yes
Overclocking
Yes
1.60 GHz
Frequency
2.00 GHz
No turbo
Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
2.60 GHz
no data
Turbo Frequency (2 Cores)
2.60 GHz
--
Turbo Frequency (4 Cores)
no data

AMD Athlon 5150 vs. AMD A4-3320M
CPU generation and family

4
CPU Cores
2
ca. 47 $
Market price
AMD Athlon 5150
Name
AMD A4-3320M
AMD Athlon
Family
AMD A
AMD Athlon 5000
CPU group
AMD A4-3000M
5
Generation
3
Desktop / Server
Segment
Mobile
--
Predecessor
--
--
Successor
--

AMD Athlon 5150 vs. AMD A4-3320M
Internal Graphics

Some manufacturers build a graphic core in many CPUs being an additional advantage. If you use a video card which is separated from a CPU, we recommend you skip this comparison as there is no need to compare AMD Athlon 5150 to AMD A4-3320M across a built-in video card.

AMD Radeon HD 8400
GPU name
AMD Radeon HD 6480G
0.60 GHz
GPU frequency
0.44 GHz
No turbo
GPU (Turbo)
No turbo
2
Execution units
3
128
Shader
240
2 GB
Max. GPU Memory
1 GB
2
Max. displays
2
5
Generation
3
11.1
Direct X
11
28 nm
Technology
32 nm
Q2/2013
Release date
Q2/2011

AMD Athlon 5150 vs. AMD A4-3320M
Hardware codec support

Pay attention to support of different technological options by CPUs. The general performance is not influenced. In the interest of time, you can skip this section.

No
h265 8bit
No
No
h265 10bit
No
No
h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
No
No
h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
No
Decode
h264
Decode
No
VP8
No
No
VP9
No
No
AV1
No
Decode
AVC
Decode
Decode
VC-1
Decode
Decode / Encode
JPEG
Decode / Encode

AMD Athlon 5150 vs. AMD A4-3320M
Memory & PCIe

Modern CPUs support memory which operates in a multi-channel regime that provides high-speed data exchange and improves productivity. The higher the ram’s clock frequency, its standard (for example, DDR3, DDR4, DDR5) and maximum space in a system are, the better it is.

DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM
Memory type
DDR3-1333
1
Memory channels
2
--
Bandwidth
--
No
ECC
No
Yes
AES-NI
Yes

AMD Athlon 5150 vs. AMD A4-3320M
Thermal Management

High-performance and powerful CPUs require the essence of a good power supply. Here you learn how much TDP AMD Athlon 5150 and AMD A4-3320M have. We recommend paying attention to the model which has lower TDP.

25 W
TDP
35 W
25 W
TDP (PL1)
35 W
--
TDP (PL2)
--
--
TDP up
--
--
TDP down
--
--
Tjunction max.
--

AMD Athlon 5150 vs. AMD A4-3320M
Technical details

Here is the main information which can define the best CPU comparing technical specifications. Thus, the higher cash L2 and L3, the better it is. The lower the technological process of CPU production, the better it is. Another important factor is a production year that directly influences the manufacturer’s support terms and the opportunity of a system modernization at minimal cost in the future.

x86-64 (64 bit)
Instruction set (ISA)
x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX
ISA extensions
SSE3, SSE4a
--
L2-Cache
--
2.00 MB
L3-Cache
2.00 MB
Jaguar. Kabini
Architecture
Llano
Technology
32 nm
AMD-V
Virtualization
AMD-V
AM1
Socket
FS1
Q2/2014
Release date
Q4/2011
--
Part Number
--

AMD Athlon 5150 vs. AMD A4-3320M
Devices using this processor

In completing the comparison between AMD Athlon 5150 and AMD A4-3320M, you can learn in which computer systems these models are used.

Unknown
Used in
Unknown

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

The version, having become a gold standard of a synthetic benchmark, allows accurately define a CPU performance in Cinema 4 Suite software complex. The most points mean a model’s best efficiency. Hyperthreading is not included.

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

It is a testing performance standard of CPU by Maxon. It is a specialized multi-platform number of tests that estimate the power of all processor cores in rendering mode.

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is Maxon’s actual benchmark for older processors versions that test the processor’s performance without hyperthreading in single-core mode.

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 benchmark reflects the efficiency of your processor operation in assessment mode. It works on Cinema 4 Suite software complex of the earlier version. Hyperthreading is not included.

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

A benchmark is designed to determine graphics cards’ performance and speed, built into their central processor. It works in iGPU mode, FP32 Performance. The higher the rate is, the better it is.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

A new approach to testing processor performance opens up the GeekBench 5 benchmark! A detailed under-load system analysis gives an accurate assessment of the quality. The higher the estimation is, the faster and more efficient the processor is. It is a version for testing a single core.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

A modern version of the GeekBench 5 benchmark reveals all opportunities and potential of your processor. As a result of testing, you can understand to what extent a processor is fast and efficient in operation with graphic apps or games.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

To define how efficient and powerful a processor is among several models or in comparison with another, we recommend paying attention to Geekbench 3 benchmark, which tests the single-core processor performance.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

To reveal the whole potential of the equipment, the Geekbench 3 benchmark uses all cores for 64bit models in a specialised software complex that imitates modelling various 3D scenarios. The higher estimation is, the better the performance is.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench R11.5 is an outdated version of the benchmark for processors of earlier generations. To find out the potential or compare it with a modern processor model, it is enough to check the performance estimate. The higher it is, the better it is. Hyperthreading is not included.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R11.5 benchmark is designed for testing early-generation processors. The overall final performance is based on 3D scene simulations in Cinema 4 Suite. It engages all processor cores.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

The authoritative benchmark PassMark shows how efficient the processor is in the overall performance rating. It takes into account the operation mode of all cores and supports hyperthreading. The benchmark is based on various scenarios for performing calculations, 2D and 3D modelling.