Comparing technical specs and benchmarks

AMD A8-5545M
VS
Intel Core i7-1160G7

AMD A8-5545M 32 nm - 1.70 GHz DDR3-1333 

Intel Core i7-1160G7 10 nm - 2.10 GHz LPDDR4X-4266 

VS

AMD A8-5545M vs. Intel Core i7-1160G7
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In comparison between AMD A8-5545M and Intel Core i7-1160G7, you should choose the model which has more cores and threads with base and turbo frequencies. All the features influence the system’s high-speed performance.

4x
Cores
no data
4 / 4
CPU Cores / Threads
4 / 8
normal
Core architecture
normal
no data
A core
0x
no data
B core
0x
No
Hyperthreading
Yes
No
Overclocking
No
1.70 GHz
Frequency
2.10 GHz
2.70 GHz
Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
2.70 GHz
Turbo Frequency (4 Cores)
3.60 GHz

AMD A8-5545M vs. Intel Core i7-1160G7
CPU generation and family

4
CPU Cores
4
AMD A8-5545M
Name
no data
AMD A
Family
no data
AMD A8-5000M
CPU group
no data
5
Generation
12
Mobile
Segment
no data
--
Predecessor
no data
--
Successor
no data

AMD A8-5545M vs. Intel Core i7-1160G7
Internal Graphics

Some manufacturers build a graphic core in many CPUs being an additional advantage. If you use a video card which is separated from a CPU, we recommend you skip this comparison as there is no need to compare AMD A8-5545M to Intel Core i7-1160G7 across a built-in video card.

AMD Radeon HD 8510G
GPU name
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96 (Tiger Lake G7)
0.45 GHz
GPU frequency
0.40 GHz
0.55 GHz
GPU (Turbo)
1.10 GHz
6
Execution units
96
384
Shader
768
2 GB
Max. GPU Memory
2
Max. displays
3
5
Generation
12
11
Direct X
12
32 nm
Technology
10 nm
Q2/2013
Release date
Q3/2020

AMD A8-5545M vs. Intel Core i7-1160G7
Hardware codec support

Pay attention to support of different technological options by CPUs. The general performance is not influenced. In the interest of time, you can skip this section.

No
h265 8bit
No
h265 10bit
No
h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
Decode / Encode
No
h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
Decode / Encode
Decode
h264
Decode / Encode
No
VP8
Decode / Encode
No
VP9
Decode / Encode
No
AV1
Decode
Decode
AVC
Decode / Encode
Decode
VC-1
Decode
Decode / Encode
JPEG
Decode / Encode

AMD A8-5545M vs. Intel Core i7-1160G7
Memory & PCIe

Modern CPUs support memory which operates in a multi-channel regime that provides high-speed data exchange and improves productivity. The higher the ram’s clock frequency, its standard (for example, DDR3, DDR4, DDR5) and maximum space in a system are, the better it is.

PCIe version
4.0
PCIe lanes
16
DDR3-1333
Memory type
LPDDR4X-4266
Max. Memory
32 GB
2
Memory channels
2
--
Bandwidth
no data
No
ECC
No
Yes
AES-NI
Yes

AMD A8-5545M vs. Intel Core i7-1160G7
Thermal Management

High-performance and powerful CPUs require the essence of a good power supply. Here you learn how much TDP AMD A8-5545M and Intel Core i7-1160G7 have. We recommend paying attention to the model which has lower TDP.

19 W
TDP
19 W
TDP (PL1)
15 W
--
TDP (PL2)
--
--
TDP up
--
--
TDP down
7 W
--
Tjunction max.
100 °C

AMD A8-5545M vs. Intel Core i7-1160G7
Technical details

Here is the main information which can define the best CPU comparing technical specifications. Thus, the higher cash L2 and L3, the better it is. The lower the technological process of CPU production, the better it is. Another important factor is a production year that directly influences the manufacturer’s support terms and the opportunity of a system modernization at minimal cost in the future.

x86-64 (64 bit)
Instruction set (ISA)
x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4
ISA extensions
no data
--
L2-Cache
5.00 MB
4.00 MB
L3-Cache
12.00 MB
Richland
Architecture
Tiger Lake UP4
32 nm
Technology
10 nm
AMD-V
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
FP2
Socket
BGA 1526
Q2/2013
Release date
Q3/2020
--
Part Number

AMD A8-5545M vs. Intel Core i7-1160G7
Devices using this processor

In completing the comparison between AMD A8-5545M and Intel Core i7-1160G7, you can learn in which computer systems these models are used.

Unknown
Used in
Unknown

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

A benchmark is designed to determine graphics cards’ performance and speed, built into their central processor. It works in iGPU mode, FP32 Performance. The higher the rate is, the better it is.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

A new approach to testing processor performance opens up the GeekBench 5 benchmark! A detailed under-load system analysis gives an accurate assessment of the quality. The higher the estimation is, the faster and more efficient the processor is. It is a version for testing a single core.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

A modern version of the GeekBench 5 benchmark reveals all opportunities and potential of your processor. As a result of testing, you can understand to what extent a processor is fast and efficient in operation with graphic apps or games.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

To define how efficient and powerful a processor is among several models or in comparison with another, we recommend paying attention to Geekbench 3 benchmark, which tests the single-core processor performance.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

To reveal the whole potential of the equipment, the Geekbench 3 benchmark uses all cores for 64bit models in a specialised software complex that imitates modelling various 3D scenarios. The higher estimation is, the better the performance is.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R11.5 benchmark is designed for testing early-generation processors. The overall final performance is based on 3D scene simulations in Cinema 4 Suite. It engages all processor cores.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

The authoritative benchmark PassMark shows how efficient the processor is in the overall performance rating. It takes into account the operation mode of all cores and supports hyperthreading. The benchmark is based on various scenarios for performing calculations, 2D and 3D modelling.