Comparing technical specs and benchmarks

AMD A6-9225
VS
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2

AMD A6-9225 28 nm - 2.60 GHz DDR4-2133 

Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2  - 2.10 GHz DDR3-1600 

VS

AMD A6-9225 vs. Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In comparison between AMD A6-9225 and Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2, you should choose the model which has more cores and threads with base and turbo frequencies. All the features influence the system’s high-speed performance.

2x
Cores
no data
2 / 2
CPU Cores / Threads
6 / 12
normal
Core architecture
no data
No
Hyperthreading
Yes
No
Overclocking
No
2.60 GHz
Frequency
2.10 GHz
3.00 GHz
Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
2.60 GHz
2.60 GHz
Turbo Frequency (2 Cores)
no data
no data
Turbo Frequency (6 Cores)
2.30 GHz

AMD A6-9225 vs. Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
CPU generation and family

2
CPU Cores
6
Market price
ca. 320 $
AMD A6-9225
Name
no data
AMD A
Family
no data
AMD A6-9000
CPU group
no data
7
Generation
Mobile
Segment
no data
--
Predecessor
no data
--
Successor
no data

AMD A6-9225 vs. Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
Internal Graphics

Some manufacturers build a graphic core in many CPUs being an additional advantage. If you use a video card which is separated from a CPU, we recommend you skip this comparison as there is no need to compare AMD A6-9225 to Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 across a built-in video card.

AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
GPU name
0.66 GHz
GPU frequency
No turbo
GPU (Turbo)
No turbo
3
Execution units
192
Shader
2 GB
Max. GPU Memory
no data
3
Max. displays
7
Generation
12
Direct X
28 nm
Technology
Q2/2016
Release date

AMD A6-9225 vs. Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
Hardware codec support

Pay attention to support of different technological options by CPUs. The general performance is not influenced. In the interest of time, you can skip this section.

Decode
h265 8bit
No
Decode
h265 10bit
No
Decode
h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
no data
Decode
h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
no data
Decode
h264
No
Decode
VP8
No
Decode
VP9
No
No
AV1
no data
Decode / Encode
AVC
No
Decode
VC-1
No
Decode / Encode
JPEG
No

AMD A6-9225 vs. Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
Memory & PCIe

Modern CPUs support memory which operates in a multi-channel regime that provides high-speed data exchange and improves productivity. The higher the ram’s clock frequency, its standard (for example, DDR3, DDR4, DDR5) and maximum space in a system are, the better it is.

3.0
PCIe version
3.0
8
PCIe lanes
40
DDR4-2133
Memory type
DDR3-1600
8 GB
Max. Memory
1
Memory channels
4
--
Bandwidth
no data
No
ECC
Yes
3.0 x 8
PCIe
no data
Yes
AES-NI
Yes

AMD A6-9225 vs. Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
Thermal Management

High-performance and powerful CPUs require the essence of a good power supply. Here you learn how much TDP AMD A6-9225 and Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 have. We recommend paying attention to the model which has lower TDP.

15 W
TDP
80 W
15 W
TDP (PL1)
no data
--
TDP (PL2)
no data
--
TDP up
--
10 W
TDP down
--
90 °C
Tjunction max.
--

AMD A6-9225 vs. Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
Technical details

Here is the main information which can define the best CPU comparing technical specifications. Thus, the higher cash L2 and L3, the better it is. The lower the technological process of CPU production, the better it is. Another important factor is a production year that directly influences the manufacturer’s support terms and the opportunity of a system modernization at minimal cost in the future.

x86-64 (64 bit)
Instruction set (ISA)
no data
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4
ISA extensions
no data
--
L2-Cache
no data
2.00 MB
L3-Cache
15.00 MB
Stoney Ridge (Excavator)
Architecture
Ivy Bridge EP
28 nm
Technology
22 nm
AMD-V, AMD-Vi
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
FP4
Socket
LGA 2011
Q3/2018
Release date
Q3/2013
--
Part Number
no data

AMD A6-9225 vs. Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
Devices using this processor

In completing the comparison between AMD A6-9225 and Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2, you can learn in which computer systems these models are used.

Unknown
Used in
Unknown

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

The version, having become a gold standard of a synthetic benchmark, allows accurately define a CPU performance in Cinema 4 Suite software complex. The most points mean a model’s best efficiency. Hyperthreading is not included.

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

It is a testing performance standard of CPU by Maxon. It is a specialized multi-platform number of tests that estimate the power of all processor cores in rendering mode.

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is Maxon’s actual benchmark for older processors versions that test the processor’s performance without hyperthreading in single-core mode.

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 benchmark reflects the efficiency of your processor operation in assessment mode. It works on Cinema 4 Suite software complex of the earlier version. Hyperthreading is not included.

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

A benchmark is designed to determine graphics cards’ performance and speed, built into their central processor. It works in iGPU mode, FP32 Performance. The higher the rate is, the better it is.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

A new approach to testing processor performance opens up the GeekBench 5 benchmark! A detailed under-load system analysis gives an accurate assessment of the quality. The higher the estimation is, the faster and more efficient the processor is. It is a version for testing a single core.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

A modern version of the GeekBench 5 benchmark reveals all opportunities and potential of your processor. As a result of testing, you can understand to what extent a processor is fast and efficient in operation with graphic apps or games.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

To define how efficient and powerful a processor is among several models or in comparison with another, we recommend paying attention to Geekbench 3 benchmark, which tests the single-core processor performance.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

To reveal the whole potential of the equipment, the Geekbench 3 benchmark uses all cores for 64bit models in a specialised software complex that imitates modelling various 3D scenarios. The higher estimation is, the better the performance is.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench R11.5 is an outdated version of the benchmark for processors of earlier generations. To find out the potential or compare it with a modern processor model, it is enough to check the performance estimate. The higher it is, the better it is. Hyperthreading is not included.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R11.5 benchmark is designed for testing early-generation processors. The overall final performance is based on 3D scene simulations in Cinema 4 Suite. It engages all processor cores.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

The authoritative benchmark PassMark shows how efficient the processor is in the overall performance rating. It takes into account the operation mode of all cores and supports hyperthreading. The benchmark is based on various scenarios for performing calculations, 2D and 3D modelling.