Comparing technical specs and benchmarks

AMD A6-9225
VS
AMD A8-7650K

AMD A6-9225 28 nm - 2.60 GHz DDR4-2133 

AMD A8-7650K 28 nm - 3.30 GHz DDR3-2133 

VS

AMD A6-9225 vs. AMD A8-7650K
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In comparison between AMD A6-9225 and AMD A8-7650K, you should choose the model which has more cores and threads with base and turbo frequencies. All the features influence the system’s high-speed performance.

2x
Cores
4x
2 / 2
CPU Cores / Threads
4 / 4
normal
Core architecture
normal
No
Hyperthreading
No
No
Overclocking
Yes
2.60 GHz
Frequency
3.30 GHz
3.00 GHz
Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
3.80 GHz
2.60 GHz
Turbo Frequency (2 Cores)
no data
no data
Turbo Frequency (4 Cores)
3.80 GHz

AMD A6-9225 vs. AMD A8-7650K
CPU generation and family

2
CPU Cores
4
Market price
ca. 95 $
AMD A6-9225
Name
AMD A8-7650K
AMD A
Family
AMD A
AMD A6-9000
CPU group
AMD A8-7000
7
Generation
6
Mobile
Segment
Mobile
--
Predecessor
--
--
Successor
--

AMD A6-9225 vs. AMD A8-7650K
Internal Graphics

Some manufacturers build a graphic core in many CPUs being an additional advantage. If you use a video card which is separated from a CPU, we recommend you skip this comparison as there is no need to compare AMD A6-9225 to AMD A8-7650K across a built-in video card.

AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
GPU name
AMD Radeon R7 - 384 (Kaveri)
0.66 GHz
GPU frequency
0.72 GHz
No turbo
GPU (Turbo)
No turbo
3
Execution units
6
192
Shader
384
2 GB
Max. GPU Memory
2 GB
3
Max. displays
2
7
Generation
6
12
Direct X
12
28 nm
Technology
28 nm
Q2/2016
Release date
Q1/2015

AMD A6-9225 vs. AMD A8-7650K
Hardware codec support

Pay attention to support of different technological options by CPUs. The general performance is not influenced. In the interest of time, you can skip this section.

Decode
h265 8bit
No
Decode
h265 10bit
No
Decode
h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
No
Decode
h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
No
Decode
h264
Decode
Decode
VP8
No
Decode
VP9
No
No
AV1
No
Decode / Encode
AVC
Decode
Decode
VC-1
Decode
Decode / Encode
JPEG
Decode / Encode

AMD A6-9225 vs. AMD A8-7650K
Memory & PCIe

Modern CPUs support memory which operates in a multi-channel regime that provides high-speed data exchange and improves productivity. The higher the ram’s clock frequency, its standard (for example, DDR3, DDR4, DDR5) and maximum space in a system are, the better it is.

3.0
PCIe version
3.0
8
PCIe lanes
16
DDR4-2133
Memory type
DDR3-2133
8 GB
Max. Memory
1
Memory channels
2
--
Bandwidth
--
No
ECC
Yes
3.0 x 8
PCIe
3.0 x 16
Yes
AES-NI
Yes

AMD A6-9225 vs. AMD A8-7650K
Thermal Management

High-performance and powerful CPUs require the essence of a good power supply. Here you learn how much TDP AMD A6-9225 and AMD A8-7650K have. We recommend paying attention to the model which has lower TDP.

15 W
TDP
95 W
15 W
TDP (PL1)
95 W
--
TDP (PL2)
--
--
TDP up
--
10 W
TDP down
--
90 °C
Tjunction max.
--

AMD A6-9225 vs. AMD A8-7650K
Technical details

Here is the main information which can define the best CPU comparing technical specifications. Thus, the higher cash L2 and L3, the better it is. The lower the technological process of CPU production, the better it is. Another important factor is a production year that directly influences the manufacturer’s support terms and the opportunity of a system modernization at minimal cost in the future.

x86-64 (64 bit)
Instruction set (ISA)
x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4
ISA extensions
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4
--
L2-Cache
--
2.00 MB
L3-Cache
4.00 MB
Stoney Ridge (Excavator)
Architecture
Kaveri
28 nm
Technology
28nm
AMD-V, AMD-Vi
Virtualization
AMD-V
FP4
Socket
FM2+
Q3/2018
Release date
Q1/2014
--
Part Number
--

AMD A6-9225 vs. AMD A8-7650K
Devices using this processor

In completing the comparison between AMD A6-9225 and AMD A8-7650K, you can learn in which computer systems these models are used.

Unknown
Used in
Unknown

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

The version, having become a gold standard of a synthetic benchmark, allows accurately define a CPU performance in Cinema 4 Suite software complex. The most points mean a model’s best efficiency. Hyperthreading is not included.

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

It is a testing performance standard of CPU by Maxon. It is a specialized multi-platform number of tests that estimate the power of all processor cores in rendering mode.

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is Maxon’s actual benchmark for older processors versions that test the processor’s performance without hyperthreading in single-core mode.

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 benchmark reflects the efficiency of your processor operation in assessment mode. It works on Cinema 4 Suite software complex of the earlier version. Hyperthreading is not included.

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

A benchmark is designed to determine graphics cards’ performance and speed, built into their central processor. It works in iGPU mode, FP32 Performance. The higher the rate is, the better it is.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

A new approach to testing processor performance opens up the GeekBench 5 benchmark! A detailed under-load system analysis gives an accurate assessment of the quality. The higher the estimation is, the faster and more efficient the processor is. It is a version for testing a single core.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

A modern version of the GeekBench 5 benchmark reveals all opportunities and potential of your processor. As a result of testing, you can understand to what extent a processor is fast and efficient in operation with graphic apps or games.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

To define how efficient and powerful a processor is among several models or in comparison with another, we recommend paying attention to Geekbench 3 benchmark, which tests the single-core processor performance.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

To reveal the whole potential of the equipment, the Geekbench 3 benchmark uses all cores for 64bit models in a specialised software complex that imitates modelling various 3D scenarios. The higher estimation is, the better the performance is.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench R11.5 is an outdated version of the benchmark for processors of earlier generations. To find out the potential or compare it with a modern processor model, it is enough to check the performance estimate. The higher it is, the better it is. Hyperthreading is not included.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R11.5 benchmark is designed for testing early-generation processors. The overall final performance is based on 3D scene simulations in Cinema 4 Suite. It engages all processor cores.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

The authoritative benchmark PassMark shows how efficient the processor is in the overall performance rating. It takes into account the operation mode of all cores and supports hyperthreading. The benchmark is based on various scenarios for performing calculations, 2D and 3D modelling.