Comparing technical specs and benchmarks

AMD A6-3670K
VS
AMD Epyc 7702

AMD A6-3670K 32 nm - 2.70 GHz DDR3-1600 

AMD Epyc 7702  - 2.00 GHz DDR4-3200 

VS

AMD A6-3670K vs. AMD Epyc 7702
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In comparison between AMD A6-3670K and AMD Epyc 7702, you should choose the model which has more cores and threads with base and turbo frequencies. All the features influence the system’s high-speed performance.

4x
Cores
64x
4 / 4
CPU Cores / Threads
64 / 128
normal
Core architecture
normal
No
Hyperthreading
Yes
Yes
Overclocking
No
2.70 GHz
Frequency
2.00 GHz
No turbo
Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
3.35 GHz
--
Turbo Frequency (4 Cores)
no data
no data
Turbo Frequency (64 Cores)
2.50 GHz

AMD A6-3670K vs. AMD Epyc 7702
CPU generation and family

4
CPU Cores
64
ca. 60 $
Market price
ca. 8000 $
AMD A6-3670K
Name
AMD Epyc 7702
AMD A
Family
AMD Epyc
AMD A6-3000
CPU group
AMD Epyc 7002
3
Generation
Desktop / Server
Segment
Desktop / Server
--
Predecessor
--
--
Successor
--

AMD A6-3670K vs. AMD Epyc 7702
Internal Graphics

Some manufacturers build a graphic core in many CPUs being an additional advantage. If you use a video card which is separated from a CPU, we recommend you skip this comparison as there is no need to compare AMD A6-3670K to AMD Epyc 7702 across a built-in video card.

AMD Radeon HD 6530D
GPU name
0.44 GHz
GPU frequency
No turbo
GPU (Turbo)
No turbo
5
Execution units
320
Shader
1 GB
Max. GPU Memory
--
3
Generation
11
Direct X
--
32 nm
Technology
Q4/2010
Release date

AMD A6-3670K vs. AMD Epyc 7702
Hardware codec support

Pay attention to support of different technological options by CPUs. The general performance is not influenced. In the interest of time, you can skip this section.

No
h265 8bit
No
No
h265 10bit
No
No
h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
No
No
h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
No
Decode
h264
No
No
VP8
No
No
VP9
No
No
AV1
No
Decode
AVC
No
Decode
VC-1
No
Decode / Encode
JPEG
No

AMD A6-3670K vs. AMD Epyc 7702
Memory & PCIe

Modern CPUs support memory which operates in a multi-channel regime that provides high-speed data exchange and improves productivity. The higher the ram’s clock frequency, its standard (for example, DDR3, DDR4, DDR5) and maximum space in a system are, the better it is.

PCIe version
4.0
PCIe lanes
128
DDR3-1600
Memory type
DDR4-3200
2
Memory channels
8
--
Bandwidth
--
No
ECC
Yes
PCIe
4.0 x 128
Yes
AES-NI
Yes

AMD A6-3670K vs. AMD Epyc 7702
Thermal Management

High-performance and powerful CPUs require the essence of a good power supply. Here you learn how much TDP AMD A6-3670K and AMD Epyc 7702 have. We recommend paying attention to the model which has lower TDP.

100 W
TDP
200 W
100 W
TDP (PL1)
200 W
--
TDP (PL2)
--
--
TDP up
--
--
TDP down
--
--
Tjunction max.
--

AMD A6-3670K vs. AMD Epyc 7702
Technical details

Here is the main information which can define the best CPU comparing technical specifications. Thus, the higher cash L2 and L3, the better it is. The lower the technological process of CPU production, the better it is. Another important factor is a production year that directly influences the manufacturer’s support terms and the opportunity of a system modernization at minimal cost in the future.

x86-64 (64 bit)
Instruction set (ISA)
x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE3, SSE4a
ISA extensions
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
--
L2-Cache
--
4.00 MB
L3-Cache
256.00 MB
Llano
Architecture
Rome (Zen 2)
32 nm
Technology
7 nm
AMD-V
Virtualization
AMD-V, SEV
FM1
Socket
SP3
Q4/2011
Release date
Q3/2019
--
Part Number
--

AMD A6-3670K vs. AMD Epyc 7702
Devices using this processor

In completing the comparison between AMD A6-3670K and AMD Epyc 7702, you can learn in which computer systems these models are used.

Unknown
Used in
Unknown

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

The version, having become a gold standard of a synthetic benchmark, allows accurately define a CPU performance in Cinema 4 Suite software complex. The most points mean a model’s best efficiency. Hyperthreading is not included.

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

It is a testing performance standard of CPU by Maxon. It is a specialized multi-platform number of tests that estimate the power of all processor cores in rendering mode.

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

The updated version of the Cinebench R23 benchmark shows an accurate performance assessment given all modern standards and apps requirements. It works in a loading mode of all cores and threads.

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

A benchmark is designed to determine graphics cards’ performance and speed, built into their central processor. It works in iGPU mode, FP32 Performance. The higher the rate is, the better it is.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

A modern version of the GeekBench 5 benchmark reveals all opportunities and potential of your processor. As a result of testing, you can understand to what extent a processor is fast and efficient in operation with graphic apps or games.

Blender 2.81 (bmw27)

Universal benchmark Blender 2.81 (bmw27) starts processor testing in rendering animated 3D images. The faster the processor copes with the task, the higher the overall performance estimation is.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench R11.5 is an outdated version of the benchmark for processors of earlier generations. To find out the potential or compare it with a modern processor model, it is enough to check the performance estimate. The higher it is, the better it is. Hyperthreading is not included.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R11.5 benchmark is designed for testing early-generation processors. The overall final performance is based on 3D scene simulations in Cinema 4 Suite. It engages all processor cores.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

The authoritative benchmark PassMark shows how efficient the processor is in the overall performance rating. It takes into account the operation mode of all cores and supports hyperthreading. The benchmark is based on various scenarios for performing calculations, 2D and 3D modelling.

Monero Hashrate kH/s

The possibility of the cryptocurrency Monero mining is being tested using a processor. Scenarios have been performed in OS Hive and boosted by XMRig v6.x.