Comparing technical specs and benchmarks
AMD A10-4655M 32 nm - 2.00 GHz DDR3-1333
AMD FX-8320E - 3.20 GHz DDR3-800/1866
AMD A10-4655M vs. AMD FX-8320E
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
In comparison between AMD A10-4655M and AMD FX-8320E, you should choose the model which has more cores and threads with base and turbo frequencies. All the features influence the system’s high-speed performance.
AMD A10-4655M vs. AMD FX-8320E
CPU generation and family
AMD A10-4655M vs. AMD FX-8320E
Internal Graphics
Some manufacturers build a graphic core in many CPUs being an additional advantage. If you use a video card which is separated from a CPU, we recommend you skip this comparison as there is no need to compare AMD A10-4655M to AMD FX-8320E across a built-in video card.
AMD A10-4655M vs. AMD FX-8320E
Hardware codec support
Pay attention to support of different technological options by CPUs. The general performance is not influenced. In the interest of time, you can skip this section.
AMD A10-4655M vs. AMD FX-8320E
Memory & PCIe
Modern CPUs support memory which operates in a multi-channel regime that provides high-speed data exchange and improves productivity. The higher the ram’s clock frequency, its standard (for example, DDR3, DDR4, DDR5) and maximum space in a system are, the better it is.
AMD A10-4655M vs. AMD FX-8320E
Thermal Management
High-performance and powerful CPUs require the essence of a good power supply. Here you learn how much TDP AMD A10-4655M and AMD FX-8320E have. We recommend paying attention to the model which has lower TDP.
AMD A10-4655M vs. AMD FX-8320E
Technical details
Here is the main information which can define the best CPU comparing technical specifications. Thus, the higher cash L2 and L3, the better it is. The lower the technological process of CPU production, the better it is. Another important factor is a production year that directly influences the manufacturer’s support terms and the opportunity of a system modernization at minimal cost in the future.
AMD A10-4655M vs. AMD FX-8320E
Devices using this processor
In completing the comparison between AMD A10-4655M and AMD FX-8320E, you can learn in which computer systems these models are used.
The version, having become a gold standard of a synthetic benchmark, allows accurately define a CPU performance in Cinema 4 Suite software complex. The most points mean a model’s best efficiency. Hyperthreading is not included.
It is a testing performance standard of CPU by Maxon. It is a specialized multi-platform number of tests that estimate the power of all processor cores in rendering mode.
Cinebench R15 is Maxon’s actual benchmark for older processors versions that test the processor’s performance without hyperthreading in single-core mode.
Cinebench R15 benchmark reflects the efficiency of your processor operation in assessment mode. It works on Cinema 4 Suite software complex of the earlier version. Hyperthreading is not included.
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
A benchmark is designed to determine graphics cards’ performance and speed, built into their central processor. It works in iGPU mode, FP32 Performance. The higher the rate is, the better it is.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
A new approach to testing processor performance opens up the GeekBench 5 benchmark! A detailed under-load system analysis gives an accurate assessment of the quality. The higher the estimation is, the faster and more efficient the processor is. It is a version for testing a single core.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
A modern version of the GeekBench 5 benchmark reveals all opportunities and potential of your processor. As a result of testing, you can understand to what extent a processor is fast and efficient in operation with graphic apps or games.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
To define how efficient and powerful a processor is among several models or in comparison with another, we recommend paying attention to Geekbench 3 benchmark, which tests the single-core processor performance.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
To reveal the whole potential of the equipment, the Geekbench 3 benchmark uses all cores for 64bit models in a specialised software complex that imitates modelling various 3D scenarios. The higher estimation is, the better the performance is.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench R11.5 is an outdated version of the benchmark for processors of earlier generations. To find out the potential or compare it with a modern processor model, it is enough to check the performance estimate. The higher it is, the better it is. Hyperthreading is not included.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R11.5 benchmark is designed for testing early-generation processors. The overall final performance is based on 3D scene simulations in Cinema 4 Suite. It engages all processor cores.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
A classic benchmark is designed for testing the built-in graphics processor that works in the OpenGL standard.
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
The authoritative benchmark PassMark shows how efficient the processor is in the overall performance rating. It takes into account the operation mode of all cores and supports hyperthreading. The benchmark is based on various scenarios for performing calculations, 2D and 3D modelling.
