AMD A10-4600M vs Intel Xeon E7-8891 v2

Comparing technical specs and benchmarks

AMD A10-4600M
VS
Intel Xeon E7-8891 v2
VS

Which to choose?

By comparing technical characteristics, you can easily take the best CPU. The most important specifications are highlighted green which influences the total CPU performance while working or playing games. It is time to compare AMD A10-4600M to Intel Xeon E7-8891 v2 and find out the difference between them.

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In comparison between AMD A10-4600M and Intel Xeon E7-8891 v2, you should choose the model which has more cores and threads with base and turbo frequencies. All the features influence the system’s high-speed performance.

2.30 GHz
Frequency
3.20 GHz
4
CPU Cores
10
3.20 GHz
Turbo (1 Core)
3.70 GHz
4
CPU Threads
20
No
Hyperthreading
Yes
Yes
Overclocking
No
3.20 GHz
Turbo (4 Cores)
no data
no data
Turbo (10 Cores)
3.70 GHz

Internal Graphics

Some manufacturers build a graphic core in many CPUs being an additional advantage. If you use a video card which is separated from a CPU, we recommend you skip this comparison as there is no need to compare AMD A10-4600M to Intel Xeon E7-8891 v2 across a built-in video card.

AMD Radeon HD 7660G
GPU name
0.50 GHz
GPU frequency
0.69 GHz
GPU (Turbo)
No turbo
4
Generation
11.2
DirectX Version
6
Execution units
384
Shader
8 GB
Max. Memory
--
2
Max. displays
32 nm
Technology
Q2/2012
Release date

Hardware codec support

Pay attention to support of different technological options by CPUs. The general performance is not influenced. In the interest of time, you can skip this section.

Decode
h264
No
Decode / Encode
JPEG
No
No
h265 8bit
No
No
h265 10bit
No
No
VP8
No
No
VP9
No
No
VC-1
No
Decode
AVC
No

RAM and PCIe

Modern CPUs support memory which operates in a multi-channel regime that provides high-speed data exchange and improves productivity. The higher the ram’s clock frequency, its standard (for example, DDR3, DDR4, DDR5) and maximum space in a system are, the better it is.

DDR3-1600
Memory type
DDR3-1600
2
Memory channels
4
No
ECC
Yes

Encryption

Learn if a CPU supports encryption data operation.

Yes
AES-NI
Yes

Thermal Management

High-performance and powerful CPUs require the essence of a good power supply. Here you learn how much TDP AMD A10-4600M and Intel Xeon E7-8891 v2 have. We recommend paying attention to the model which has lower TDP.

35 W
TDP
155 W
--
Tjunction max.
--
--
TDP up
--
--
TDP down
--

Technical details

Here is the main information which can define the best CPU comparing technical specifications. Thus, the higher cash L2 and L3, the better it is. The lower the technological process of CPU production, the better it is. Another important factor is a production year that directly influences the manufacturer’s support terms and the opportunity of a system modernization at minimal cost in the future.

4.00 MB
L3-Cache
38.00 MB
32 nm
Technology
22 nm
Trinity
Architecture
Ivy Bridge EX
AMD-V
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
FS1r2
Socket
LGA 2011
Q2/2012
Release date
Q1/2014
Market price
ca. 5000 $

Devices using this processor

In completing the comparison between AMD A10-4600M and Intel Xeon E7-8891 v2, you can learn in which computer systems these models are used.

Unknown
Used in
Unknown

CPU generation and family

Boss

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is Maxon’s actual benchmark for older processors versions that test the processor’s performance without hyperthreading in single-core mode.

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 benchmark reflects the efficiency of your processor operation in assessment mode. It works on Cinema 4 Suite software complex of the earlier version. Hyperthreading is not included.

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

A benchmark is designed to determine graphics cards’ performance and speed, built into their central processor. It works in iGPU mode, FP32 Performance. The higher the rate is, the better it is.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

A new approach to testing processor performance opens up the GeekBench 5 benchmark! A detailed under-load system analysis gives an accurate assessment of the quality. The higher the estimation is, the faster and more efficient the processor is. It is a version for testing a single core.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

A modern version of the GeekBench 5 benchmark reveals all opportunities and potential of your processor. As a result of testing, you can understand to what extent a processor is fast and efficient in operation with graphic apps or games.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

To define how efficient and powerful a processor is among several models or in comparison with another, we recommend paying attention to Geekbench 3 benchmark, which tests the single-core processor performance.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

To reveal the whole potential of the equipment, the Geekbench 3 benchmark uses all cores for 64bit models in a specialised software complex that imitates modelling various 3D scenarios. The higher estimation is, the better the performance is.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench R11.5 is an outdated version of the benchmark for processors of earlier generations. To find out the potential or compare it with a modern processor model, it is enough to check the performance estimate. The higher it is, the better it is. Hyperthreading is not included.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R11.5 benchmark is designed for testing early-generation processors. The overall final performance is based on 3D scene simulations in Cinema 4 Suite. It engages all processor cores.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)

A classic benchmark is designed for testing the built-in graphics processor that works in the OpenGL standard.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

The authoritative benchmark PassMark shows how efficient the processor is in the overall performance rating. It takes into account the operation mode of all cores and supports hyperthreading. The benchmark is based on various scenarios for performing calculations, 2D and 3D modelling.